File talk:Prostitute tj.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This file was nominated for deletion on 12 July 2009 but was kept. If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first. |
Evidence?[edit]
Just to be clear, how do we know this is a prostitute not just a woman wearing few/tight clothing? - Themightyquill (talk) 00:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- There's no way to know and it's literally pathetic that this picture was a POTD. Just pathetic and shameful. The picture is nothing special whatsoever. Literally nothing. It's a chicks back centered and it's high res. Nothing impressive about the image whatsoever. When you add in the fact that there is no evidence that it's not just a chick in stripper heels, it's a BLP concern. She could, for example, be a stripper waiting for a ride. How this image has been kept is one thing, but featured? Unbelievable. Jennavecia (Talk) 15:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- I just came across this photo on English Wikipedia and was struck to find out it was Featured as well --it lack of featured merit seems to offer embarrassing evidence for the hormone-charged tastes of the people who selected it. --Bobak (talk) 23:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
- Illogical hypothesis, insulting delineate for living people. Totally Shameful.-Sysywjel (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
It's shameful that people would attack this image in such a manner. It's a woman dressed as a prostitute photographed in an area well known for legal prostitution. You should be ashamed for attacking and degrading her profession. 169.233.38.156 07:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Then we should describe this file with the facts: "Girl on shorts and high heels in [Tomas could complete which area] in Tijuana" and provide some information on the area. Regardless of our own opinions on the issue, we know there is an extended opinion against prostitutes. --Javier ME (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
