File talk:Tram at Morden Road (geograph 4925147).jpg

Duplicate

@Butko and Chris j wood: Which of these two should stay? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:45, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin and Túrelio: - I'm confused. As best I can see from the history File:Tram at Morden Road (geograph 4925147).jpg is a redirect to File:Tramlink (26078062093).jpg. What is more it is a redirect that Túrelio seems to have created two hours after Tuvalkin asked the above question. Unless Túrelio did something to delete the history, there never was an image called File:Tram at Morden Road (geograph 4925147).jpg. So I cannot answer the question; either File:Tram at Morden Road (geograph 4925147).jpg never existed, or all evidence of it has been purged, so I don't have the information I would need to begin to answer it. In fact I don't even know why you asked me; did I have some connection with either image?. -- Chris j wood (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Later. I have located both versions on flickr and geograph and they do seem to be the same photo separately uploaded to both of those services by the original author. So I guess I'm cool with what has been done, if a little puzzled. I've updated the surviving copy with the fuller description that the author uploaded to geograph, and I've added the alsoGeograph template to try and avoid future confusions. -- Chris j wood (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

• I think that Túrelio just acted upon my tagging of this pair of duplicates in the usual way. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
• @Chris j wood: To be clear — yes there were two separate file pages showing two separate files (apparently the same visual information but differing in filesize therefore with varying metadata and maybe even slight pixel differences). I think you did well by adding the Geograph info that was lost while transforming one of the filepages into a redirect to the other. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)