File talk:Delfshaven, Overschie en Schiebroek.jpg
Ik zie dat mijn correctie weer is teruggedraaid, maar Schiebroek is echt in geen velden of wegen te bekennen op deze kaart... Rotterdam wel, linksboven. Beetje jammer om dan roomser dan de paus te zijn en per se de foute beschrijving van het Nationaal Archief te willen handhaven. Een goede beschrijving staat op deze site. Notum-sit (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Or in english: Seeing my correction undone I think it's rather silly to stick with the National Archive's obviously wrong mentioning of Schiebroek, which isn't within miles of the Schie actually. I also don't see why shouldn't be mentioned that Rotterdam IS in the top left corner of the "map", being far more interesting than Schiebroek ever has been... A correct description can be found on this site.
- The image is is from the Nationaal Archief, and the description is from the Nationaal Archief. I don't mind if you want to add to that description, but only when you add a reliable source. So far you didn't. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think the hereabove mentioned Erfgoedhuis Zuid-Holland is unreliable actually. It's rather sad that the National Archive turns out to be rather unreliable itself, especially considering the comment somebody (not me) left with the map already 4 years ago pointing out the Archive's mistake. Notum-sit (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't criticize the Geschiedenis van Zuid-Holland site. I meant the edits you made on the file-page. You did not provide a source there. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think the hereabove mentioned Erfgoedhuis Zuid-Holland is unreliable actually. It's rather sad that the National Archive turns out to be rather unreliable itself, especially considering the comment somebody (not me) left with the map already 4 years ago pointing out the Archive's mistake. Notum-sit (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
