User talk:Jan Arkesteijn

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jan Arkesteijn!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki — it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. If you have experience contributing to Wikipedia, we have information that you might find useful.

Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can see the files you have uploaded in your gallery. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. Only upload freely licensed or public domain content. Fair use is not allowed on Commons. If you're copying files from another Wikimedia project, use the CommonsHelper. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Simply tag it as {{speedy|reason for deletion}}. For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

File:Heliopolis-Poster-WEB.jpg

I hold the copyrights of this file and the film. how to upload it? I tried to even publish it @ flickr under public domain. but still Commons refuses it,

Help please

I created the files you claim are copyrighted!

For example http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Conversionunit.jpg

I created them myself! Do I have to pay myself then copyright dues? No I think not.

Old masters paintings

Hello Jan. I am very interested in painting of old masters of Europe. especially I am a fun of portraits. You know how to download images from different auction sites, such as christies, sothebys and others. I constantly watch for updates in your gallery. Thank you for what you do. In this regard, I request to you. Display (upload) at the your gallery regularly or send me on my address lois976@yandex.ru high resolution images of the old masters from the sites auctions christies and sothebys. I'll be very grateful for the help.

180px-LIO-Architecture.png

This file helps to understand the architecture of the LIO open source target software. Thomas Uhl (talk)

?

Misschien heb je het vermogen en de wens om hoge-resolutie afbeeldingen plaats van deze bron:

http://www.collectieantwerpen.be/component/option,com_memorix/Itemid,2/lang,nl/

Portret van aartshertogin Isabella Rubens, Peter Paul Rubenshuis

Portret van aartshertog Albrecht Rubens, Peter Paul Rubenshuis

Portret van Cosmo di Medici Rubens, Peter Paul Museum Plantin-Moretus / Prentenkabinet

Portret van Alfons, koning van Aragon en Napels Rubens, Peter Paul Museum Plantin-Moretus / Prentenkabinet

Portret van Paus Leo X Rubens, Peter Paul Museum Plantin-Moretus / Prentenkabinet

Portret van Lorenzo di Medici Rubens, Peter Paul Museum Plantin-Moretus / Prentenkabinet

Francesco I de Medici Allori, Alessandro Bronzino Museum Mayer Van den Bergh

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.187.237.92 (talk • contribs) 2011-07-21T11:10:01 (UTC)

Reply

Hello, Jan Arkesteijn. You have new messages at Morning Sunshine's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Jan Arkesteijn⧽: العربية, български, Deutsch, English, ‎français, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎മലയാളം, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska, اردو, 中文

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Source portrait of Sebastian I of Portugal by Sanches Coelho

Hi! I'm currently writing an article about the portraits of Sebastian I and I haven't been able to find the source of this portrait in which he appears as a child. Could you add the source from which you took it, if you know in which museum can be found right now? I would be very grateful. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.142.245.111 (talk) 19:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Nick en Simon (2013).jpg

File:Nick en Simon (2013).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Source © Nationaal Comité 4 en 5 mei - 2016 and Photot ©Rogier Jaarsma Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Anefo & Nationaal Archief

Perhaps you're interested in this item in the GLAM newsletter (just in case you missed it). Vysotsky (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Portret van een jongeman

Hoi Jan. Zag dat je een afbeelding geüpload hebt van 'Portret van een jongeman', waarvan geclaimd wordt dat het van Rembrandt is. De fotograaf claimt echter copyright. Nu kan dat volgens mij niet wat de afbeelding betreft, maar kan het misschien wel omdat hij ook de lijst fotografeerde? En hoe zeker ben je dat er geen copyright op zit? Er zijn anders nog enkele dagen te gaan om nog snel even een nieuw kiekje van het schilderij te maken. Alvast bedankt voor een reactie! mvg. Happytravels (talk) 13:21, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hoi HT, ik kom even niet mee. De laatste jongeman van Rembrandt die ik uploadde heeft geen lijst. Misschien heb je het over een ander schilderij? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Hoi Jan, zie nu pas je reactie (de ping heeft niet gewerkt). Het gaat om dezelfde afbeelding. Je hebt er alleen een uitsnede van gebruikt. De lijst heb je weggelaten. De vragen staan daarom nog steeds. Happytravels (talk) 04:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Hallo HT, Ik ben geen specialist op het gebied van copyright, maar als je dieper in krochten van Commons zoekt vindt je vast een verklaring die het volgende weergeeft: Een fotograaf kan geen auteursrecht claimen op een foto van een schilderij in het publieke domein als hij een foto heeft gemaakt waarin het creatieve proces van de fotograaf niet herkenbaar is. In dit geval is een zo goed mogelijke kopie geen creatief proces. Als het om de lijst gaat; als het een lijst is in het publieke domein geldt hetzelfde, als het een nieuwe lijst is waar auteursrecht op ligt, ligt dat niet bij de fotograaf. De fotograaf kan alleen auteursrecht claimen op zijn creatieve manier waarop de lijst is afgebeeld. Maar omdat de lijst niet is afgebeeld is dat niet relevant. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lena Zavaroni (1974).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lena Zavaroni (1974).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Source & permission added.  Done Vysotsky (talk) 18:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

your request

the item has be undeleted. Sorry for any inconvenience JarrahTree (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

no need to apologise - it has been undeleted. JarrahTree (talk) 10:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

better minds than mine will be needed to ponder that issue I think JarrahTree (talk) 10:49, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

I don't think this photograph of Guy Thys should have been undeleted. It is a lowres image of this (highres) photograph of Guy Thys. Please tell me if I overlook any issues, though. I try to replace lowres images, and try carefully not to touch on retouched or improved images. I think it would be good if every photograph that isn't identical to the original source, should be labeled {{retouched}} or "cropped" or "extracted from" when uploaded. Vysotsky (talk) 11:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Vysotsky, no you didn't overlook something. The talk spreads over two pages. Look here for the rest. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cécile Révauger (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cécile Révauger (2018).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

KA^{Pour les intimes} 05:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Mollat

Hi, as you probably noticed, another user questions the licenses of the files extrated from the Librairie Mollat videos. I was preparing to reply to reply that the free licenses look fine, but I see that some videos don't have the free licence at the source, although there is a free licence in the EXIF of the Commons file (for example File:Ariane Chemin (2018).jpg). Is it because the Librairie Mollat changed the license at the source after the upload to Commons, or is there a mistake? -- Asclepias (talk) 19:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Ariane Chemin (2018).jpg

File:Ariane Chemin (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 06:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Didier Le Fur (2018).jpg

File:Didier Le Fur (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 06:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Bernard Foglino (2018).jpg

File:Bernard Foglino (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 06:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Christophe Guillaumot (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Christophe Guillaumot (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 06:49, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Michaël Uras (2018).jpg

File:Michaël Uras (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 06:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Mylène Bouchard (2018).jpg

File:Mylène Bouchard (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 06:56, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Jane Sautière (2018).jpg

File:Jane Sautière (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 07:01, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

License changes

Hello, could you please kindly be careful to avoid changing the license of the files you upload? Just take a look at your uploads I modified today and I am sure you will understand what I mean. Thanks and happy commoning, — Racconish ^💬 15:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

License review

Vergeet bij het uploaden van screenshots van YouTube niet om {{LicenseReview}} toe te voegen! - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 02:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ali Niknam (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ali Niknam (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 08:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:André van Duin (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:André van Duin (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 08:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Angela de Jong (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angela de Jong (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 08:03, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tom Roes (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tom Roes (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Halina Reijn (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Halina Reijn (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:03, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lex Uiting (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lex Uiting (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:04, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Owen Schumacher (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Owen Schumacher (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Géza Weisz (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Géza Weisz (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:13, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jan Beuving (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jan Beuving (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File:John Fentener van Vlissingen (2018).jpg

File:John Fentener van Vlissingen (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Pierre Bokma (2018).jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pierre Bokma (2018).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Evi Hanssen (2018).jpg

And also:

• File:Karwan Fatah-Black (2018).jpg
• File:Piet Emmer (2018).jpg
• File:Noa Wildschut (2017).jpg
• File:Jonna Frazer (2017).jpg
• File:Simone Kleinsma (2017).jpg
• File:Lex Uiting (2018).jpg
• File:George van Houts (2018).jpg
• File:Siegfried Woldhek (2017).jpg
• File:Jett Rebel (2017).jpg
• File:Bénédicte Ficq (2018).jpg
• File:Jacob Derwig (2018).jpg
• File:Humberto Tan (2017).jpg
• File:Tim Hofman (2018).jpg
• File:Bert Maalderink (2018).jpg
• File:Matthijs van Nieuwkerk (2018).jpg
• File:Raymond Janssen (2017).jpg
• File:William Boeva (2018).jpg
• File:Tamino (2017).jpg
• File:Mai Spijkers (2018).jpg
• File:Tom Roes (2018).jpg
• File:Halina Reijn (2018).jpg
• File:René Bernards (2018).jpg
• File:Delv!s (2017).jpg
• File:Dieuwertje Blok (2018).jpg
• File:Jeroen Stekelenburg (2018).jpg
• File:Huub van der Lubbe (2017).jpg
• File:Kiet Engels (2017).jpg
• File:Cathérine Moerkerke (2018).jpg
• File:Owen Schumacher (2018).jpg
• File:Géza Weisz (2018).jpg
• File:Hans Clevers (2018).jpg
• File:Bilall Fallah (2018).jpg
• File:Wende Snijders (2017).jpg
• File:Sander Schimmelpenninck (2017).jpg
• File:Bo van Spilbeeck (2018).jpg
• File:John Fentener van Vlissingen (2018).jpg
• File:Matthijs van Heijningen (2018).jpg
• File:Pierre Bokma (2018).jpg
• File:Kimberley Bos (2018).jpg
• File:Naaz (2017).jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 03:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Deze is voor de YouTube screenshots van bekende Nederlanders. Veel artikelen zouden het zonder afbeelding moeten stellen als we die niet hadden! - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:51, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Delv!s (2017).jpg

File:Delv!s (2017).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The youtube license is "Standard YouTube Licence" which means the entire video clip is copyrighted. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Jonna Frazer (2017).jpg

File:Jonna Frazer (2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LutzBruno (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Naaz

For Naaz, there is a replacement image in this source if it is given. There is no source for this file: File:Naaz (2017).jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

• Never mind. I suddenly found the source for File:Naaz (2017).jpg Next time, please give the direct source for a youtube upload or there may be a license change as in this case and the image will risk deletion. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:37, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Pascale Kramer (2018).jpg

File:Pascale Kramer (2018).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 06:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Young woman at an open half-door, attributed to Samuel van Hoogstraten.jpg en File:Samuel van Hoogstraten - Vrouw bij een half open deur.jpg

Hallo Jan Arkesteijn, kan je deze afbeeldingen eens van dichtbij bekijken en de nodige correcties aanbrengen, categoriseren/beschrijving aanpassen. (Rembrandt catalog raisonné, 1968)?.Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 08:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, wat moet ik er mee doen? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:35, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Mezelf weer niet duidelijk uitgedrukt waarschijnlijk: deze afbeelding -- > File:Young woman at an open half-door, attributed to Samuel van Hoogstraten.jpg werd ondergebracht in de Category:Paintings by Samuel van Hoogstraten en deze file File:Samuel van Hoogstraten - Vrouw bij een half open deur.jpg zou volgens wikidata het werk van Rembrandt zijn. 2x hetzelfde schilderij hoort toch in principe te worden ondergebracht in dezelfde categorieën en dezelfde titel te dragen? Vandaar mijn vraag. Ik had mijn vraag misschien ook aan Dedden kunnen stellen. Lotje (talk) 13:35, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

RKD schrijft het werk toe aan Hoogstraten. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)