MediaWiki talk:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete/ru

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Localization of MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete for ru[edit]

{{Edit request}}

{{gadget-desc|self=MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete/ru|name=AjaxQuickDelete|talk=MediaWiki talk:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js|doc=Help:AjaxQuickDelete|example=Help:NDTL/ru|Добавляет ссылки «<tt>Номинировать на удаление</tt>» и «<tt>Обсудить категорию</tt>» в раздел «Инструменты» в боковой панели, а также ссылки «<tt>Переименовать файл с заменой всех включений</tt>» (только для переименовывающих файлы) и «<tt>Обработать дубликаты</tt>» (только для администраторов) при нахождении в соответствующих местах. Также этот гаджет используется другими гаджетами.}}

Pacha Tchernof (talk) 08:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pavel Kaganer, please take a look at the purposed second translation: yours wasn't reviewed since December 14, 2017 (I didn't notice it because of the interface features) and the ru message has not been yet created.

The button "Nominate to deletion" currently uses the preposition "на", "Номинировать на удаление", I used it in my suggestion. Also, I used the translations for other strings from MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js/ru.js with one exception. I suggest to use here and change there translation for "Discuss category" from the currently used "Номинировать категорию для обсуждения" into "Обсудить категорию". For me, "Номинировать … для обсуждения" sounds like "Start discussion about …'s discussion" :) The nomination is itself the start for discussion, isn't it? So I hope you support my current suggestion and the additional update translation when I placed it on the gadget's localization talk page.

To the users, I suppose, it would be understandable: when they would click on the "Обсудить категорию", there would be additional explanations for them about what does it mean: to discuss the category from this button, and not discuss it on the Category's Talk page. So, I think, they won't be confused. — Pacha Tchernof (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Your version is more applicable. I'm removed my old proposal. --Kaganer (talk) 10:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]