User talk:Stefan Kühn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Please, write my at w:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Stefan Kühn!


Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token cab6d92416f02c2278fedaef98b2c1ac[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Deutschordenskommende Trier[edit]

Hallo Stefan, deine Uploads von der Deutschordenskommende Trier sind jetzt in Category:Deutschordenskommende Trier, da der alte Kat.-Name einen Tippfehler enthielt und zu unspezifisch war. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Danke. -- sk (talk) 09:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. odder (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Besten Dank. -- sk (talk) 12:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Eduard Imhof - Passo di San Giacomo.jpg[edit]

Hi, File:Eduard Imhof - Passo di San Giacomo.jpg needs the {{PD}} tag updating. On what grounds is it PD? Rd232 (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Mentioned at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Transfer_of_copyright as an example. Rd232 (talk) 12:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Kompass F73[edit]

Hallo Stefan, stimmt das so? Ich habe nicht mehr nachvollziehen können, wie das Bild auf de-wp hieß. --Markscheider (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Passt! Danke. --sk (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Roßthal 2010 Schulfest 06.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Roßthal 2010 Schulfest 06.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

File:DDR Museum Zeitreise Radebeul Delitzscher Pralinien.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:DDR Museum Zeitreise Radebeul Delitzscher Pralinien.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Roßthal 2010 Schulfest 06.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Roßthal 2010 Schulfest 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 16:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Thanks, moogsi (blah) 06:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

File:SWR-Filmteam mit elektronischen Kameras.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SWR-Filmteam mit elektronischen Kameras.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Weissbier (talk) 12:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Karte Transsib[edit]

Hallo Stefan, die von Dir erstellte Karte File:Map Trans-Siberian railway.png enthält einen Fehler: Die blaue Linie ist die, die die Züge zwischen Moskau und dem fernen Osten derzeit nutzen. Die rote Linie westlich des Schnittpunktes von roter und blauer Linie ist dagegen die historische. Das liegt wohl daran, dass die rote Linie heute ein Stück auf kasachischem Staatsgebiet liegt, was die russische Bahn im Inlandsverkehr selbstverständlich umfährt. -- Reinhard Dietrich (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Reinhard, ich kann die Karte nicht mehr ändern, da ich nicht mehr an die Software ran komme, mit der ich damals die Karte erzeugt habe in der Uni. Das wäre also ein Fall für die de:Wikipedia:Kartenwerkstatt -- sk (talk) 14:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Die Konfusion hier wurde übrigens durch User:Miass eingebracht, der die Karte (Farben) änderte, ohne die Bildbeschreibung anzupassen. -- Хрюша ?? 17:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | русский | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Start hand.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––Apalsola tc 20:58, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

At the moment I work at the Category:Images uploaded by Fæ (70000 most uncategorised images). Yesterday I found many aircraft for the Category:McDonnell_Douglas_aircraft. Sorry I am not known the sub-categories of this category. -- sk (talk) 04:48, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Deinen Edit …[edit]

hier solltest du belegen. Meine im Bild genannte Quelle (Begleittext zur Reproduktion von Scheuchzers Kartenmanuskript zur Nova Helvetiae Tabula Geographica 1712/1713) besagt etwas anderes. -- Хрюша ?? 16:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Ich bin vom Prof. Lorenz Hurni persönlich angesprochen worden darauf. Seiner Aussage zufolge gibt es diese Karte nicht in der Sammlung des Instituts für Kartographie der ETH Zürich. Er verwies auch auf den OPAC Eintrag und vermutet das es davon eine Faksimile ist. Wie man dem OPAC entnehmen kann, gibt es die Karte in der Kartensammlung der Bibliothek der ETH-Zürich, das ist aber eine andere Einrichtung als das Instituts für Kartographie. Er möchte die wiederholten Anfragen betr. Reproduktionsbewilligung, für die das Instituts für Kartographie nicht zuständig ist, abstellen. Legitimes Anliegen aus meiner Sicht, deswegen die Änderung. -- sk (talk) 17:04, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Na dann … … nehmen wir an, dem sei so. -- Хрюша ?? 17:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Dresden pics[edit]

You've been uploading some great images of Dresden!

Could you I ask you to categorise them to a category for the book as well, Category:Die geschichtliche Entwickelung der Residenzstadt Dresden (1893) KRAUSE, Bruno, which is now linked to from the index at Commons:British_Library/Mechanical_Curator_collection/Synoptic_index,_Europe#.E2.80.93_Saxony_and_Thuringia.

Thanks! Jheald (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I can also insert this pictures in this category. Is there not a bot? --sk (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm hoping Magnus may adapt one of his tools to help upload a whole book at a time, & create the category at the same time. I talked to him about it on Thursday evening, and he seemed receptive, but he has a lot of calls on his time. But for the moment, I am sorry but there is not a bot. (Though one can select a lot of images & categorise them all at once, using cat-a-lot). Jheald (talk) 18:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
And today Magnus emailed me that Step 1 is now done: he's adapted his flickr2commons bot, so that you can now pre-specify a tag as well as a username -- so you can now use it to look at all of the images from a particular book -- and then choose which ones you want to upload.
He tells me that: "I'll look into step 2 (generating the special template for BL) soon. Just so you know I haven't forgotten you ;-) "
So I hope this is a step in the right direction. Jheald (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)