Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2020/07

View opposition
Nominated by: T.Bednarz (talk) on 2020-04-06 01:07 (UTC)
Scope: Alexandros Katranis
Question How do you compare to this and this? pandakekok9 06:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] @Pandakekok9: I don't like the tight composition of the first image, but the second one seems to be VI as well. Do you suggest MVR? --T.Bednarz (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10 (4).jpg: +2 2. Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10.jpg: 0 <-- => File:Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10 (4).jpg: Promoted. File:Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10.jpg: Declined. <-- --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: T.Bednarz (talk) on 2020-04-08 20:47 (UTC)
Scope: Alexandros Katranis
Support I prefer this one over the other because this one doesn't have the distracting white spots that the other has when seen in review size. I don't think those spots could be fixed, so this nomination should be VI. --pandakekok9 05:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support This is the better image. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10 (4).jpg: +2 <-- 2. Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10.jpg: 0 => File:Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10 (4).jpg: Promoted. <-- File:Alexandros Katranis, U21 CZE-GRE 2019-10-10.jpg: Declined. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} on 2018-06-22 15:29 (UTC)
Scope: Portrait of Eva Le Gallienne
Used in: See global usage
Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)`[reply] MVR opened on May 6, 2020. Scores: 1. Eva Le Gallienne (mnwp.275003, cropped restoration).jpg: +2 2. Eva Le Gallienne 275003v crop.jpg: 0 <-- => File:Eva Le Gallienne (mnwp.275003, cropped restoration).jpg: Promoted. File:Eva Le Gallienne 275003v crop.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) on 2020-05-06 15:24 (UTC)
Scope: Portrait of Eva Le Gallienne
Support Better version than the current VI. --MrClog (talk) 20:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support Prefer this one for the lighting. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:35, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Eva Le Gallienne (mnwp.275003, cropped restoration).jpg: +2 <-- 2. Eva Le Gallienne 275003v crop.jpg: 0 => File:Eva Le Gallienne (mnwp.275003, cropped restoration).jpg: Promoted. <-- File:Eva Le Gallienne 275003v crop.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:38, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: pandakekok9 on 2020-04-03 11:09 (UTC)
Scope: Type 11 light machine gun
Oppose this is better, the nominated picture is too blurry Ezarateesteban 19:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Nominated the other image in the same scope for MVR. pandakekok9 03:07, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Comment I still think this photo is better. This shows the ammunition box, and this image comes from a Japanese military source (the Type 11 is a Japanese machine gun after all). So I think this image is more valuable, despite the quality. pandakekok9 03:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support per pandakekok9. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Support per pandakekok9. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Japanese Type 11 LMG from 1933 book.jpg: +1 <-- 2. Automatic Rifle (9885171694).jpg: -2 => File:Japanese Type 11 LMG from 1933 book.jpg: Promoted. <-- File:Automatic Rifle (9885171694).jpg: Declined. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: pandakekok9 on 2020-04-04 02:37 (UTC)
Scope: Type 11 light machine gun
Reason: As suggested by Ezarate at Commons:Valued image candidates/Japanese Type 11 LMG from 1933 book.jpg. -- pandakekok9
Neutral I still think the earlier nomination is better, since the reflections on this photo are distracting IMO. The right foot of the bipod is also a bit cut off. I won't object though if this one passes. --pandakekok9 02:37, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Oppose per pandakekok9. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] Oppose ditto. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Japanese Type 11 LMG from 1933 book.jpg: +1 2. Automatic Rifle (9885171694).jpg: -2 <-- => File:Japanese Type 11 LMG from 1933 book.jpg: Promoted. File:Automatic Rifle (9885171694).jpg: Declined. <-- --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 15:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Navigation menu