Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ледяные парусники.jpg

File:Ледяные парусники.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2018 at 10:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ледяные парусники.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ледяные парусники.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info created and uploaded by Discoverynn - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- KSK (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Resolution could be better, but very nice composition. --XRay ^talk 11:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Resolution is too low for me; 6 megapixels from a 36MP camera. Images should not be downsized and I can't see a good reason why this one should be. There's also the adage that "all sunsets are beautiful", so while this is a pretty picture in itself, there are so many pretty sunsets on Commons that an FP must give us something extra special. This doesn't, since it's so small.--Peulle (talk) 11:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

   Comment @Peulle and others. The full size is uploaded. 34 megapixels are enough? Please, look at the bigger size. --KSK (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

• Still not quite sure. I'll go with  Neutral.--Peulle (talk) 14:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Peulle. It's a very nice idea but the execution of it plus processing could be better. --Cart (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per XRay, but mostly per Peulle. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 23:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Now. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 03:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Peulle --The NMI User (talk) 08:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

  @The NMI User. The full size is uploaded. Please, look at the bigger size. --KSK (talk) 09:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Regretful oppose per others; it's a great image that unfortunately falls apart technically at the edges. Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support I love Baikal lake. - Benh (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Good size now but it still doesn't wow me. Btw, it looks tilted to me. Ok, we have no real horizon, but the opposite shoreline is far enough to be used as level gauge. --Cart (talk) 09:33, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

   Done--KSK (talk) 12:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

• KSK, I  Support, conditional on your fixing one dust spot that's on the right in the sky a bit above the lake. Otherwise, the photo with the ice forms is beautiful and special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

   Done Dust spot removed.--KSK (talk) 09:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support A lot of wow, and good quality. Yann (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose The motif is outstanding, but die technical quality is below FP requirement, I guess especially regarding the loss of sharpness towards the edges. --Milseburg (talk) 16:20, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good work.--Naturephotographers (talk) 17:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Dэя-Бøяg 01:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:35, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural