Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:080710-N-7981E-482.jpg

File:A-18F after launch from USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72).jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2009 at 10:24:28

•  Info created by US Navy, uploaded by Alaniaris - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose viewing angle, most of the plane hidden by the wings --Andreas 06 (talk) 12:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support A difficult subject.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Andreas --norro 16:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad angle --ianaré (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support good angle shows afterburner, rear of drop tanks & missiles, flaps, undercarriage and tailplanes not visible in front shots. Encyclopedic value very high. Please make a note of the ordinance loadout on the image description. Dhatfield (talk) 00:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info The photo doesn't state exactly what the loadout is, but as far as I can tell it's carrying an AGM-65 Maverick, a 500lb bomb, 2 or 3 external drop tanks and possibly an AIM-9 Sidewinder on the left wingtip. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 03:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Per Dhatfield. —kallerna™ 13:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per above. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Notyourbroom (talk) 04:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Farzaaaad2000 (talk) 13:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • as a courtesy to the nominator, please give a reason when opposing --ianaré (talk) 15:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
    •  Info I recently made a template {{ExplainVote}} for this sort of situation :) --Notyourbroom (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral =>  featured. HBR (talk) 20:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

---

As discovered by Colin on 2021-12-04 and reported then on the FPC talk page, the promotion of this photo was a procedural error – 7 support votes, 4 oppose votes mean “not featured”, not “featured”. Therefore I have crossed out the result above. The result should be:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)