Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Apophysis 3D fractal ball.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Apophysis 3D fractal ball.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2009 at 22:18:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Garden Garden. 22:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Garden. 22:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Durova (talk) 22:22, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Request This is a beautiful artificial image, but would you please elaborate on why it is a valuable addition to Commons? I do not know much about this area. —Notyourbroom (talk) 02:56, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell it's the only example of a 3D Apophysis flame (i.e. one made with that program) on this website. Garden. 10:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Great educational image since it shows that the concept of a fractal is wider than the Mandelbrot set and Sierpinsky triangle laymen typically associate with the term. -- JovanCormac 07:26, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Request None of that theoretical context and detail is present on the image's description page. Would you (or George) mind adding more information to help a layperson such as myself? Maybe a few well-placed wikilinks, too. —Notyourbroom (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have added a few words (in English) highlighting the two fractals shown in the image. The parameters given on the description page didn't work for me, though; therefore, I cannot give detailed information on the projection that links the surface of the sphere and the plane. It looks deceptively like a stereographic projection but I don't think it is, since the tiles are not evenly spaced on the surface of the sphere. -- JovanCormac 07:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Request None of that theoretical context and detail is present on the image's description page. Would you (or George) mind adding more information to help a layperson such as myself? Maybe a few well-placed wikilinks, too. —Notyourbroom (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture. Also i support it as an mathematician, per JovanCormac -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- I never knew you were a mathematician as well. Cheers! -- JovanCormac 13:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support For Jovan Cormac. Jacopo Werther (talk) 11:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Per others --Cesco77 (talk) 12:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent image. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic! -- Ra'ike T C 08:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good! --Karel (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated