Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg

File:Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2021 at 21:13:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg

3756

4044

431

665

6470

5751

leaning windows ?

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
•  Info created & uploaded by User:Maksimsokolov - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek. This is an example of an older building being completely overwhelmed by taller modern buildings behind it, but the building immediately behind it has quite interesting architecture, in my opinion, with the steps on top on both sides, so I find the composition very intriguing. I recognize that whether to judge this an FP is a question of balancing the photo's strengths with its weaknesses but believe it's worth a nomination and look forward to reading your opinions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Of course, here is something different! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Hulged (talk) 03:32, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Imho it is a clear FP image: a balanced dynamic range and a great light, shadow and color harmony. The interplay of different and similar building structures is fascinating. In short, I love this composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per Radomianin. (I was thinking about nominating this one myself, so thank you, Ikan, especially for this nomination!) --Aristeas (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Normally, I'd say this was a good example of the problem of extreme wide angle perspective distortion. The upper floors of that building on the left appear larger than the ground floors (they are further away, yet the perspective has maintained their size). So I'd oppose if they were the only subject. But here the contrast is being emphasised like some cartoon effect and it works to make the point. -- Colin (talk) 08:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 10:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Old stylishly meets new Cmao20 (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Clever juxtaposition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support This really is telling a story. --Kreuzschnabel 12:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 13:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 19:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

• Another sockpuppet of Livioandronico2013. - Benh (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support pretty much per Colin --El Grafo (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC))

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada