Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coffee Grinder Zassenhaus.jpg

File:Coffee Grinder Zassenhaus.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2009 at 13:48:45

•  Info created by Siebengang - uploaded by Siebengang - nominated by Siebengang -- Siebengang (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Siebengang (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Mbz1 (talk) 13:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I raised the exposure/brightness a bit, according to the suggested File:Coffee Grinder Zassenhaus edit.jpg by User:Richard Bartz. Furthermore I tilted the crop slightly (old version did not look completely vertical). I think voting should reflect only one version, so I merge the two sections (hope that's ok). --Siebengang (talk) 09:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

The following five votes/comments were originally posted with regard to File:Coffee Grinder Zassenhaus edit.jpg, but I think they reflect the present version of the image as well (--Siebengang (talk) 09:19, 29 January 2009 (UTC)):

•  Info I was bold and raised the exposure (of the first version) up 1 step with Adobe Lightroom. No further adjustments.
•  Support Nice grinder --Richard Bartz (talk) 17:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 19:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the colors went somewhat off by that. I can do the adjustment on the raw image as soon as I find the time for it. --Siebengang (talk) 20:30, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Klar, du hast die Referenz. Ich habs mal mechanisch angehoben ;-) lg --Richard Bartz (talk) 22:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

•  Support nice ianaré (talk) 23:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The subject is ordinary. The picture is composed well and this is solid work, but not extraordinary. Crapload (talk) 06:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just common picture. No reason for nomination for FP. --Karel (talk) 22:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Peripitus (talk) 00:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Artificial composition. Although effective at demonstrating that the mill is associated with coffee, an actual coffee mill would never be operated under these conditions. The thought evokes visions of beans shaking and spilling onto the floor. Durova (talk) 20:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Thanks for your critique! And, yes the beans were spilling on the floor, but I just saw them as decoration and a nicely colored dark background... Maybe I will try a more encyclopaedic coffee mill action shot some time in the future, but until then this version will have to suffice. --Siebengang (talk) 09:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose no wow factor - Man On Mission (talk) 11:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Beckground fits perfectly. --Lošmi (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Pom² (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)