Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elisabethkirche Schneeberg color corr.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Elisabethkirche Schneeberg color corr.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2011 at 09:28:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by User:Hendric Stattmann - edited & uploaded by User:Amada44 - nominated by User:Hendric Stattmann -- Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Comment The original version of the file was in the nomination process recently, but was withdrawn upon criticism related to post-processing issues. This version has been improved by User:Amada44 and IMHO does address the problems.-- Hendric Stattmann (talk) 09:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Support Indeed, it is much better now. --Tomer T (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Neutral Very nice! Where the original didn't even catch my eye (I kept scrolling past it), this one is incredible. What I would have done, though, is taken several images with the people moving so that they could be painted out and still have a faithful reproduction of this building. The people are very distracting. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:03, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I didn't bring my tripod so I was not able to take several identical shots. The presence of people around this highly touristic spot is representative for what you usually see when you go there. I am not sure whether the kind of edit you suggest is in agreement with the encyclopedic documentation obligations. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree that it wouldn't be encyclopedic. I mean, many images nominated here are compiled from many images. I could see cloning the people out to be problematic, since you're effectively altering any actual information and details, but combining several images of the exact same subject at different times, I don't see that as a problem at all. Oh well, too bad for the no-tripod thing, then. People aren't always bad in a shot, they can provide scale. But the "tourism" factor just doesn't sit with me. Sorry :( – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 10:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support The improvements made by user:Amada44 address all the PP-related criticism. Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Murdockcrc (talk) 05:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral -- Very carefully composed and good technical quality. Lacks some magic though. I'm undecided... Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Well, it's just a church, eh? If you would have the opportunity to go there in a cold morning, I guarantee you would feel the magic! :-) Hendric Stattmann (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe so, it depends on the hour. If it were too early, I would feel dumb and feel nothing... As for my assessment, it may happen that I'm having higher expectations than I should. Are you acquainted with my opposing rules (especially #8 and #10)? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- I fully support your set of rules, which could be valid for any case where other people's work is to be judged. I also try to evaluate the FP candidates in the most objective way and make efforts to give constructive hints about how to improve. By the way, my initial comment above was not entirely serious (see the smiley!) and certainly not intended to seed doubts about your judgement abilities. Kind regards, Hendric Stattmann (talk) 22:04, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe so, it depends on the hour. If it were too early, I would feel dumb and feel nothing... As for my assessment, it may happen that I'm having higher expectations than I should. Are you acquainted with my opposing rules (especially #8 and #10)? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Abderitestatos (talk) 03:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- now Support. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support I don't now if my vote is not too biased as I did the color correction on that image…. None the less I think that the composition of the image is excellent and therefor I support the image. Amada44 talk to me 09:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Miguel Bugallo 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
