Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Göltzschtalbrücke blick nach oben 0582.jpg

File:Göltzschtalbrücke blick nach oben 0582.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2018 at 22:51:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Göltzschtalbrücke blick nach oben 0582.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Göltzschtalbrücke blick nach oben 0582.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
•  Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Very interesting photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
•  weak oppose While I admit the composition is pretty cool, the image also has a low level of detail that seems to have been washed out - almost as if it has had too much noise reduction.--Peulle (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Have been thinking about it for a while. It's nice, but it's off enough (vertically and horizontally) that it kills it in my view. - Benh (talk) 11:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

  I think that Benh is right, is it possible to re-shot the scene taking care of the symmetry, that would be a FP, definitely Poco² 13:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

  •  Comment In my opinion, this doesn't necessarily have to be symmetrical, which is very difficult to achieve during recording, although I also appreciate symmetry as a design element.

"Symmetry is the aesthetics of the stupid" Ludwig Mies van der Rohe.--Ermell (talk) 20:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

• Please, mind your manners. Using this roundabout way to imply that other users are stupid, is not good. --cart-Talk 17:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment You know it's not meant that way, but if you really want to, you can understand it that way. Thank you for the friendly admonition. No offence.--Ermell (talk) 22:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

• I've added the quote to wikiquote:Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, though it is disputed. dllu (t,c) 21:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose The corbels at left and right are, per Peulle, unsharp; they should not be. Daniel Case (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
• Maybe Ludwig would have had second thoughts after looking at this picture in portrait. - Benh (talk) 19:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

• <span style="{{Transform-rotate|90}}; margin:50px 0px">[[File:Göltzschtalbrücke blick nach oben 0582.jpg|300px]]</span>

•  Info Converting diplayed file to text since it might be what's blocking the bot. --cart-Talk 11:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not only is it not well centered, the periphery of the image is not sufficiently sharp. dllu (t,c) 21:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support impressive to me --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree that everything doesn't have to be centered all the time, but when you do something off-center, it is usually better to go all the way and create a new interesting perspective. Something like shown in this very crude diagram. Also used in this rather famous photo. --cart-Talk 13:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support an industrial cathedral --Neptuul (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 22:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Info Moving post closing discussion to up here since it seems to be blocking the bot. --cart-Talk 11:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Comment - There are no alternatives and the vote is 8-4, so the result should be a feature. Apparently, the addition of a different view in a post confused the bot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Yes, I saw that. But if you came here, saw this and had time to write the comment, why didn't you just close the nom yourself? Any experienced user at FPC can close noms. --cart-Talk 10:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

• I never really learned how. I remember there was a thread on the talk page in which you gave the steps, but where can I see a permanently placed set of instructions? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: , we always need people who can help with this never-ending task. The hardest part is now done by the bot, once you have closed one or two, you will see how easy it is though. You don't have to start with the tricky ones, just helping out with the normal 'featured' or 'not featured' is a good step. There is a permanent guide at Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished that link is in the rules section of COM:FPC so no problem finding it. Or you could save a link to my little tutorial in your notebook or something. Here it is: Commons talk:Featured picture candidates/Archive 19#Closing FPCs. --cart-Talk 19:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 10:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges