User talk:Neptuul

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Neptuul!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 09:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:12, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Neptuul⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Neptuul,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Photo Challenge Bronze

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture UN-Sicherheitsrat - UN Security Council - New York City - 2014 01 06.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Politics and politicians, in April-May 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaubernuss Witch-hazel Hamamelis - Winterblueher Winter-flowering.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Greenish CA (see note) and oversharpening artefacts in the sky and around some branches. Fixable. --Cccefalon 16:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Thanks! I'll correct it in the next days. --Neptuul 08:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)  Done --Neptuul 10:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Considerably better and QI --Cccefalon 11:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Ein Herzliches Dankeschön für Deinen WLE-Beitrag 2016

Hallo Neptuul,

der diesjährige Fotowettbewerb „Wiki Loves Earth“ liegt hinter uns. Für Deutschland haben mehr als 1100 Teilnehmer über 18.000 Fotos hochgeladen. Damit sind wir ein gutes Stück vorangekommen bei der Dokumentation der Schutzgebiete und zu schützenden Objekte unserer Natur.

Vorjury und Hauptjury haben eine Auslese nach qualitativen Kriterien vorgenommen und im Ergebnis wurden 100 Preisträger ermittelt. Die TOP-100-Fotos von 64 Fotografen findet Ihr auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Doch der gesamte Fotoschatz lässt sich mit nur 100 Fotos kaum erfassen. Daher habe ich nach Themenfeldern eine persönliche Auswahl vorgenommen und diese in Form von Kalenderpostern zusammengestellt. Über ein offizielles Poster mit den TOP-100 hinaus gibt es auch Poster zu Flora, Fauna, Landschaften und zur Geologie. Für jeden Geschmack dürfte bei dieser Kollektion etwas dabei sind. Wer Lust hat kann sich eine preisgünstige Druckerei suchen und ein solches Poster für ca. 15 € im Format A1 ausdrucken lassen. Alle fünf Poster zusammen zeigen mehr als 400 Fotos von über 160 Teilnehmern.

• 
  TOP-100
• 
  Landschaften
• 
  Fauna
• 
  Flora
• 
  Geologie

Wenn alles klappt, dann wird das TOP-100-Poster in Kürze auch in höherer Auflage gedruckt und auf der bevorstehenden WikiCon in der Region Stuttgart (Kornwestheim) für die Teilnehmer zum Mitnehmen und Weiterverteilen vorliegen. Auf dieser vom 16.-18. September stattfindenden Konferenz wollen wir auch nächste Schritte und mögliche Projekte mit Blick auf WLE-2017 diskutieren. Vorschläge für eine WLE-Preisverleihung und einen WLE-Workshop im Rahmen der WikiCon liegen auf dem Tisch. Es wäre schön, wenn auch Du dabei wärst.

Der Kalender reicht übrigens bis Juni 2017 und soll dazu einladen, schon in den kommenden Wochen und Monaten erneut auf Fototour rund um den Naturschutz zu gehen. Möge Euch ein Poster bis zum 4. WLE-Fotowettbewerb im Mai 2017 begleiten. Von mir allen Teilnehmern ein ganz persönliches Dankeschön und den Preisträgern einen herzlichen Glückwunsch. ( Bernd Gross, 20:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC))

Wiki Loves Earth 2017

Hallo Neptuul,

bald startet wieder Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland, unser Fotowettbewerb rund um das Themengebiet Naturschutz. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du wieder mitmachst.

Bilder können vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2017 eingereicht werden.

WLE Deutschland kooperiert dieses Jahr mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission (DUK). Die bestplatzierten Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten, Weltnaturerbe und UNESCO-Geoparks sollen auf http://www.unesco.de präsentiert werden.

Die allgemeinen Wünsche der Organisatoren haben sich nicht geändert: Schutzgebiet oder -objekt angeben, Originalauflösung, keine Signaturen oder ähnliches im Bild.

Die Suche nach geeigneten Motiven erleichtern unter anderem neue Listen aller deutschen Naturwaldreservate oder Listen der Naturdenkmale in Baden-Württemberg, im Saarland, Hessen und Brandenburg. Stöbere einfach mal bei Wikipedia, z. B. auf der Karte.

Eine Vorjury wird die Vorauswahl der Bilder übernehmen. Hier kannst Du Dich ebenfalls gerne beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,

--Blech (talk) April 2017

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Neptuul,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiche in der Kreuzwiese.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dicker Stein - Frühjahr 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2017 - Danke, und wie geht es weiter?

Hallo Neptuul,

vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland. Damit hast Du ein Stück Natur in Deiner Region dokumentiert und Wikipedia geholfen, andere darüber zu informieren.

Dieses Jahr wurden 24.000 Fotos eingereicht, im vorigen Jahr waren es noch 18.000. Bei der Teilnehmerzahl (1063) wurde der Rekord vom Vorjahr nur knapp verpasst.

Um die große Zahl von Bildern angemessen zu bewältigen, suchen wir weitere Helfer für die Vorjury, zum Kategorisieren oder zum Einfügen der Bilder in die Artikel und Listen der Wikipedia.

Eine Jury wird Anfang Juli auf einer Sitzung in Fulda die besten Bilder auswählen. Nach dem Zeitplan sollen die Top100 am 15. Juli 2017 veröffentlicht werden. Kurz danach werden die Gewinner benachrichtigt.

Wir möchten auf Wiki Loves Earth Biosphere Reserves hinweisen. Bei diesem Wettbewerb können bis Ende Juni Bilder von Biosphärenreservaten aus aller Welt eingereicht werden. Selbstverständlich darf man das ganze Jahr über Bilder zu beliebigen Themen bei Wikimedia Commons hochladen, nicht nur wenn ein Wettbewerb läuft...

Freundliche Grüße.

--Blech (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvis-Presley-Denkmal vor den ehemaligen Ray Barracks in Friedberg Hessen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 19:57, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doppelsonne Halo Hoherodskopf Hessen 15-07-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Cloning error in upper left corner needs fixing.--Peulle 13:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC) --- Thank you, it's fixed --Neptuul 16:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Support Good image.--Peulle 23:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kraemerbruecke und Aegidienkirche Erfurt 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reife Konstantinopeler Quitten aus dem Vogelsberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ, Tournasol7 22:38, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170205-DSC01906 Friedhof Engelrod WP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurt mit Strommast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right side is leaning in, please correct the perspective, otherwise IMO OK. --Basotxerri 17:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC) --> thanks for the note, correction done --Neptuul 22:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Sorry but it still seems leaning. Please check my notes on your image. --Basotxerri 21:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC) --> it's now correct? --Neptuul 10:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC) OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 19:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götzener Linde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. IMO a bit oversharpened, but quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Römerturm, Auf dem Gaulskopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 19:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hybrid-Schwarzpappel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 05:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Douglasie (Pseudotsuga menziesii).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Münzenberg - Linde und westlicher Bergfried.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good perspective,a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 19:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2018

Hallo Neptuul,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2018 können beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland wieder Landschafts- und Naturfotos eingereicht werden. Sie sollen in Schutzgebieten aufgenommen worden sein. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch dieses Jahr mitmachst.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen, als Einstiegsseite kann diese Karte dienen.

Als ehemaliger Teilnehmer kannst Du bis Ende April bei der Wahl der Jury abstimmen.

Da viele tausend Bilder zu bewerten sind, wird die sogenannte Vorjury ab Anfang Mai eine Vorauswahl der eingereichten Bilder übernehmen. Deine Beteiligung daran ist ausdrücklich erwünscht. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt dann per E-Mail.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--Blech (talk) April 2018

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlehenbusch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:45, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stieleiche - Schloss Eisenbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annenkapelle mit Fichtenstamm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochbeet aus Naturstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you reduce the vignetting, please? --Basotxerri 15:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC) -  Done It's ok? --Neptuul 15:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:55, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Zimmerpflanze).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:37, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loewe von Amphipolis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lion of Amphipolis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Amphipolis Lion.jpg seems to be a better candidate for this scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

•  Support IMO, nominated photo is better than Archaeodontosaurus mentioned. Voltmetro 17:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I'm rather indifferent. This has the entire statue and base, the other one is better of the subject. I don't have an objection to the photo but please format the scope properly and remove "Category:". You can take a look at the others to see the formatting. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:41, 8 July 2018 (UTC)  Done --Neptuul (talk) 07:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Neptuul,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Røvær 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Røvær 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Røvær 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Røvær 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Røvær 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and sharp, but a bit imbalanced composition. I suggest cropping it a bit.--Peulle 08:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)  Done --Neptuul 08:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC) OK. --Peulle 10:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Røvær 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London, under the Blackfriars Railway Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Røvær und Leuchtturm Røværsholmen WP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Europäische Gottesanbeterin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Öresundbrücke - Ansicht von Klagshamn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grabkreuz mit Nägeln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some strange moires at Sensor Level, but still good enough --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 10:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kopenhagen, Kalvebod Bølge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christiania in.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The sky seems a bit bright but it's not eating up the leaves so ok imo --Trougnouf 21:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christiania exit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe if you crop out the vehicle? It's out of focus so a distracting foreground. --Trougnouf 21:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)  Done --Neptuul 13:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality, thank you --Trougnouf 13:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Your picture "Krokusse im Herbst"

Dear,

The picture, that you have uploaded as "Krokusse im Herbst" is not of crocusses, but of Sternbergia - I guess S. clusiana.

Sternbergia species are often wrongly called "autumn-crocusses". I have renamed your file and classified it accordingly.

Best botanical regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 19:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much! --Neptuul (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

You are welcome. I guess that it is Sternbergia clusiana, because it is naked-flowering. The other yellow Sternbergia (S. lutea, S. sicula, etc.) have already developped leaves when flowering. Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 21:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks so much! --Neptuul (talk) 00:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Réginald alias Meneerke bloem You added now the Category: "Unidentified Sternbergia" - is it not a clusiana? --Neptuul (talk) 12:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Dear Neptuul, I have in the meantime looked at some pictures of Sternbergia sp., which were also put in the category "Unidentified Sternbergia". Some were obviously Sternbergia lutea, which I have reclassified. Others as yours are still put in that category, for two reasons:

• Sternbergia clusiana is not indigenous in the Balkans, but in desertal regions of Asia Minor and of a few Greek islands.
• In some variants of Sternbergia lutea leaves appear when the flower is fading.

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 14:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sternbergia in Greece.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zaubernuss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments At the top very tight cut. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Witch-hazel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Week dust spot on the left side should be removed. --Ermell 20:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)  Done --Neptuul 21:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2019

Hallo Neptuul,

vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2019 kannst Du wieder beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland (WLE 2019) teilnehmen. Gesucht sind selbst aufgenommene Landschafts- und Naturfotos aus Schutzgebieten in Deutschland.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg kann diese Übersichtsseite dienen.

WLE 2019 kann nur durchgeführt werden, wenn weitere Mitarbeiter und Mitarbeiterinnen unser Team verstärken. Es geht unter anderem um die Organisation in der Wikipedia und das Sortieren der Bilder auf Commons. Über Art und Umfang der Beteiligung entscheidest Du selbst.

Wie in den Vorjahren übernimmt eine Vorjury ab Anfang Mai die Vorauswahl der Bilder. Auch daran kannst Du Dich gern beteiligen. Bei Interesse trage Dich bitte unter WLE-Vorjury ein, das Passwort kommt per E-Mail.

Besonders engagierte Freiwillige werden für die Jury benötigt. Wenn Du vom 12. bis 14. Juli in Fulda die besten Bilder küren willst, melde Dich auf der Jury-Seite.

Wir wünschen viel Freude beim Fotografieren,

--GPSLeo (talk) (im Auftrag des Organisationsteams) 17:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbrannter Wald, Thasos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shelf cloud over Asprovalta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Thanks --Moroder 16:23, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kavala, Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquadukt, Kavala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks like a painting to me. Like too much clarity and sharpning / luminance --Podzemnik 02:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC) @Podzemnik all parameter are in balance --Neptuul 06:30, 26 June 2019 (UTC)  Support IMHO the photo is OK – maybe a bit too much sharpening, but I have seen much worse sharpening effects in QIs. Also a very useful, instructive view of the aqueduct! If there are objections, please move to consensual review. --Aristeas 15:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC); better wording 09:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kasta tumulus - view from Amphipolis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pferch - pen - στάνη 20190709 DSC3703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:16, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavandula fields.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angitis Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but a little oversharpened --Michielverbeek 18:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge - Angitis Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railway station - Angitis- Canyon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you straighten the verticals? Right side of the building is leaning --Podzemnik 01:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)  Done --Neptuul 08:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)  Support Thank you --Podzemnik 01:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Neptuul,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 00:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Neptuul,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Neptuul,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dover Castle SE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilze im Moos auf Basalt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The reason why the geodata are not displayed is funny and unfounded IMO. --Ermell 17:49, 29 December 2019 (UTC) Funny yes, if you insinuate on those mushroom pickers wich keep a secret of their hunting grounds. That's not my intention, it's only because of privacy, the ground is in a not public garden. --Neptuul 18:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC) However, Stockschwämmchen are not that popular. --Ermell 22:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC) Privacy is a high value --Neptuul 22:24, 1 January 2020 (UTC) The crop should be much tighter and the categorization better. --Ermell 16:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Ermell: Are you shure the mushrooms are Stockschwämmchen (Kueheromyces mutabilis), can you exclude Gift-Häubling (Galerina marginata)? --Neptuul 22:54, 2 January 2020 (UTC)  Done crop + description --Neptuul 00:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 07:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvis Presley Memorial, former proving ground Eichkopf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image looks overprocessed and the categorization should be better. Categories are not tags. --XRay 05:15, 22 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. You should add a comment with {{Done}} if you fixed the issues. --XRay 18:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvis Presley Memorial, former proving ground Eichkopf 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done processing and categorization optimized --Neptuul 21:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Personally I would reduce the sharpening a bit, but this is a matter of taste. --Aristeas 09:07, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baumwollfeld bei Lagyna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soufli - Vasileos Georgiou Street and Papanastasiou Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit too dark --Poco a poco 11:15, 6 October 2020 (UTC) --- Now brighter --Neptuul 11:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)  Support ok --Poco a poco 07:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kastro, Kavala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though I would have loved this motif symmetrical --Smial 14:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angitis river near the source.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Aristoteles der Stagirit.jpg

File:Aristoteles der Stagirit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Phlsph7 (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)