Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosa ‘Gloria Dei’ syn. ‘Peace’.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Rosa ‘Gloria Dei’ syn. ‘Peace’.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2011 at 21:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Michael Gäbler- uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC)- Support --Cephas (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Very nice. My only wish is it weren't so bright in the top center, we lose a lot of detail. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 22:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment "A lot" ? really ?--Jebulon (talk) 07:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Raghith 06:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support --W.Rebel (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Nice flower, well done photo -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:15, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Oppose It's nice, but not the most beautiful rose I've seen, and the background looks weird (The patterns look like a badly compressed file). Some small parts of the subject (mostly the edges) are blurred and it feels like it was added over the background in post processing. Is it because of the stack focusing ? - Benh (talk)- Info Focus stacking is a digital image processing technique which combines multiple images taken at different focus distances to give a resulting image with a greater depth of field (DOF) than in this image. The hazziness in a resulting image may have one of three reasons: 1) The used image is on this place out of focus and there is no second image with the right focus on this point. I used Helicon Focus and 21 images taken at different focus distances. Maybe Helicon Remote takes more images and solves this problem. 2) There are some images (also sharp images) with different focus laying one on top of the other like a sandwich. The problem of Focus stack is: images with different focus have different sizes. The resulting sandwich-image is sometimes blurred (there are different images not congruent on the same place). Therefore I put copies from the sharp images to all blurred places. 3) The edges may sometimes be blurred, because images with another focus are looking over the edges and hides the background, because they have a larger size than the sharp image. Then it is needed to restore the background. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Good job. ---donald- (talk) 19:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Overall very good imo --Cayambe (talk) 07:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the lighting, and the sharpness is generally good. But I agree with Benh about the image's problems, and I think some of the blurred edges haven't been healed well (e.g. the wide stripe on the yellow petal outlining the central group of petals). --Avenue (talk) 16:32, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose strange background, tight crop, lighting is partially too harsh. Amazing sharpness though. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose - Very nice flower, but the background ruins it. -- pro2 16:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Also to me the background ruins it, but it's a good image--Miguel Bugallo 00:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- oppose /Ö 19:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
