User talk:Cayambe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive
201020112012201320142015
201620172018201920202021
201920202021202220232024





Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alectoris barbara in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière à Bridel 2024b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:07, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière à Bridel 2024c – hôtel à insectes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bambësch 06 - Jan 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laitche 15:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridel, tilleul remarquable, janv 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PëtschtLann02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Wife for scale? ;) (Indeed, I'd usually consider a person on such a picture disturbing, but here she actually serves a purpose.) Still, the picture might need a personality rights template. --Plozessor 05:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wife, yes. Personality rights added. Thanks for the review. --Cayambe 09:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallée Bëtler Baach – Chapelle, 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please correct the date, per description this was taken 9 minutes after it was uploaded. --Plozessor 05:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC) ✓ Done Strange enough, I don't know where this came from... --Cayambe 16:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cimetière à Bridel 2024d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridel – plaque 150 years of independence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not the best composition but good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bigonville, Dermicht 2023 P.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:56, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schumannseck – Battle of the Bulge Memorial Trail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]