Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utö kyrka October 2015.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Utö kyrka October 2015.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2016 at 08:58:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info created &uploaded by ArildV - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - I love this composition, the light, and the counterpoint between the clouds and the autumn leaves. The church is sharp. There's some unsharpness at the left, but I don't think it ruins the photo at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support INeverCry 09:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 12:00, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, a very good QI with no doubt, but nothing special enough for a FP in my opinion. Especially the church is just common.--Jebulon (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - If this were just a picture of the church in a dull or blue sky, I might agree with you, but not with these clouds and autumn leaves. Mais chacun à son goût. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support I like the autumn colours of the leaves, the interesting sky and the painted church in between. There are subtle features also leading the eye towards the church. The wide-angle view over-exaggerates the perspective of the church a bit perhaps. -- Colin (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support The whole is greater than its parts, and that's saying a lot considering how strong the parts are—the church steeple severe and solitary against the mackerel sky, the leaves on the ground accentuating the message the gravestones around them convey of the impermanence of life. You could not do better if you were to pick a scene on which a hypothetical Bergman movie were to begin. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 07:19, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Zcebeci (talk) 12:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:53, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - per nom. Excellent lighting and nice composition. Nikhil (talk) 06:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 18:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Support-- 晴空·和岩 讨论页·反互煮 02:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- "Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Jee 12:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:29, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 22:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture