Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/COVID-19 photo portraits

COVID-19 photo portraits, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2020 at 19:41:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

• 
  Portrait of Giulio Mensi, anesthesiologist
• 
  Portrait of Olivia Giorgi, nurse Intensive Care Unit
• 
  Portrait of Eleonora Hulsof, nurse anesthetist
• 
  Portrait of Federico Neri, nurse anesthetist
• 
  Portrait of Silvia Ligi, anesthesiologist doctor
• 
  Portrait of Vincenzo Siciliano, intensive care nurse
• 
  Portrait of Francesca Palumbo, intensive care nurse
• 
  Portrait of Federico Paolin, anesthesiologist doctor
• 
  Portrait of Annalisa Silvestri, anesthesiologist doctor
• 
  Portrait of Monica Luzi, anesthesiologist doctor
• 
  Portrait of Maria Trillini, nurse Intensive Care Unit
• 
  Portrait of Michelle Brozzi, anesthesiologist doctor
• 
  Portrait of Luciano Paolucci. first aid doctor
• 
  Portrait of Marina Massarini, anesthesiologist doctor

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
•  Info created by Alberto Giuliani - uploaded by Alberto Giuliani - nominated by Camelia.boban -- Camelia (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I nominated again this serie of portraits seen as a set by the author and by who published this shooting (e.g. Faces of the frontline by The British Journal of Photography). As for the previous discussion, many express their support, with the condition to exclude the photo n° 09 which is not a portrait. The other 2 photos, n° 02 and 09 were nominated separately. -- Camelia (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support, I hope there will be no objections this time. All photos shoud be also promoted to Quality within a few days. --Andrei (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:17, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- powerful and meaningful portraits. Seven Pandas (talk) 11:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Timely, but most of the images are poorly composed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support ----ahuR ☘ 12:50, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support A striking, powerful series! It's been critically acclaimed worldwide and we're exremely lucky to have it on Commons. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:53, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I can accept this as a set because the diversity of it makes the impact of this series greater than seeing the photos one by one, sort of similar to the posters we have of flowers. This is also how these photos are usually presented around the world. The series is so noted, it's probably only a matter of time before it has its own WP article. I know what the FPC guidelines says about sets, but we live in exceptional times and to me this is a case of ignoring rules that keep us from improving this Wiki Project. Looking at any one of the photos, I see a good portrait; as a set I see it as a real contender for POTY. (Sets are counted as one entry in the POTY voting) --Cart (talk) 13:17, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Having this stuff on Commons is great, but per Charles, in some cases there is just too much room over the head and in one case the head is cropped. I see that these works have been published but does it make out of if a set? I would support some of these images but not all of them are FP and I don't see the fulfillment of any of the criteria for a set nomination, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 15:28, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Danu Widjajanto (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I highly appreciate the photographer's work, but such a big collection isn't something I would file under "the very best of Commons". A couple of well selected photos from the same series is enough. --A.Savin 16:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 20:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Powerful and representative images --Postcrosser (talk) 20:35, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Alsakan (talk) 03:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support -- MartinD (talk) 11:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Grtek (talk) 14:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Martin Falbisoner. --Aristeas (talk) 10:31, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Strong support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Not every one of them would be a good FP candidate on its own. But as a set they work very well. --El Grafo (talk) 12:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --Milseburg (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Works much better as a set of just portraits. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support, yes! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak support Individually these images wouldn't pass. But as a set, I doubt, we have anything even remotely as powerful in this domain. --MB-one (talk) 20:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support but as a compromise with people opposing the candidature, this proposal looks to me like two sets, portraits of the faces and portraits of half the body.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Question Why are there no black doctors in these photos? --Wilfredor (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment As I recall, these folks all work at a hospital in Pesaro, Italy. I'm guessing there probably aren't black personnel there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work