Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Israeli West Bank Barrier.jpg

File:Israeli West Bank Barrier.jpg, not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2012 at 13:33:08

•  Info Full of chromatic aberration, especially in the sky (Original nomination)
•  Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Delist I like the composition and there are no CA, but the image is full of (colour) noise, sharpness and details are on an low level; also poor colours --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:12, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

   Neutral The new version is much better. Very good work, Wetenschatje! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Keep Because of the historical value of the subject. A FP is not only a super Quality Image. We have to be very careful in the delisting process IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 13:28, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Isn't the rationale "because of the historical value" lacking in NPOV? What makes the subject of high historical value? Tomer T (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't see any point of view, neutral or not, here. Opinions about this barrier is not important here. But this barrier exists, and it is an historical fact.--Jebulon (talk) 11:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Delist –ElmA (Talk – My files – E-mail) 16:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Delist Cathy Richards (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep per Jebulon.. the image quality is not so bad..and the subject has high encyclopedic value and aesthetically is nice. do we have another featured image, like that, of the isreali barrier? Ggia (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep Good picture of historical value. Achird (talk) 00:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep as others. Yann (talk) 22:01, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep No noticeable chromatic aberration, no reason to delist --Tony Wills (talk) 22:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep. I would have voted to delist the original version, per Carschten, but Wetenschatje's subsequent edit has improved it a lot. Still not that sharp, but good enough IMO. --Avenue (talk) 11:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep - Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Keep --Katarighe (Talk) 17:08, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 delist, 8 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 4 February 2012 (UTC)