Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 25 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Marcinelle_-_Centre_de_délassement_-_piscine_-_2020_-_03.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Swimming pools in Marcinelle (Charleroi). --Jmh2o 12:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry but the sky is overcropped which caused perspective issues. --Vincent60030 10:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't see a problem with the perspective. The bottom of the pool is not flat, but sloping and there is refraction of light on the surface of the water --Jmh2o 10:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Apologies, I meant composition. Let's move this to discussion. --Vincent60030 11:14, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't see any reviews done by Jmh2o as requested by QIC guidelines for each nomination --Moroder 04:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Moroder 04:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

File:2014_Powiat_cieszyński,_Kończyce_Wielkie,_Drzewa_na_ulicy_Zamkowej.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Trees on Zamkowa Street. Kończyce Wielkie, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 15:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Good enough for me, but category needs improving @Halavar: --Vincent60030 07:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 11:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose  Not done --Vincent60030 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose My understanding is that for QI, unless the trees are incidental to the photo, their species or at least genus needs to be included in the categories. -- Ikan Kekek 10:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Jelgava_Churches_10.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination High Altar Icons of Orthodox Cathedral in Jelgava --Scotch Mist 06:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough for quality image, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for your review - lighting conditions and access are often far from ideal in churches but have attempted to slightly sharpen image and passed for the opinion of others --Scotch Mist 10:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lighting conditions may be hard for the photographer but should not be an argument for lower quality in our review. Perhaps you took out the best of it, but I still see too dark areas on the top an a low level of detail combined with significant file compression.--Augustgeyler 10:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 09:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)