User talk:Cayambe/Archive13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín Botánico de Puerto de la Cruz – Encephalartos laurentianus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:55, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín Botánico de Puerto de la Cruz – Encephalartos laurentianus info.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alonso de Nava y Grimón – Jardín Botánico, Puerto de la Cruz 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 10:46, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gallotia galloti in Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clervaux – 1, rue de Bastogne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 20:59, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Botanical Garden in Puerto de la Cruz – Pond 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz) – carrefour près ancienne maison communale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:38, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz) – Duerfstrooss 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinheim, route d'Echternach – monument 1839-1989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinheim, route d'Echternach – monument 1839-1989 en grand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinheim, Luxembourg, chapelle et ancienne école.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz) – Duerfstrooss 39, 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinheim – Hôtel Gruber 2021c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 12:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschweiler (Wiltz) – carrefour près ancienne maison communale, large.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:27, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Orotava 2021 – Canarias Concept.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Ventanas has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Ntra. Sra. de la Paz, ext. from left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Georges Mouton, Phalsbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:30, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalsbourg, plaque Georges Mouton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phalsbourg, place d'Armes, sept 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Georges Mouton, Phalsbourg – Plaque Prise de Burgos 10 9 1808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de la Cruz – Ntra. Sra. de la Paz, lateral entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 17:37, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lône de Blaud 01, Ardèche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument Georges Mouton, Phalsbourg – Plaque Passage du pont de Landshutt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Cayambe! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 22 December 2022 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lône de Blaud 06 – cygnes tuberculés 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:00, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Cruz 2022 – Glyphosate, Roundup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bech Gare Amphithéâtre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altrier, café Mamer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:27, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemstal – Antennes RTL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape west of Bech.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemstal Gare 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligne Luxembourg-Echternach – Entrée Tunnel Bech 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligne Luxembourg-Echternach – Tunnel Bech.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bech, Luxembourg, Hôtel à insectes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ichneumonidae – Luxembourg, Hollerich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Becher Gare, restaurant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 23:36, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligne Luxembourg-Echternach – Sortie tunnel à Bech.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
could you remove the pylon on the lower right corner? --Grunpfnul 09:42, 29 December 2022 (UTC) ✓ Done Pylon removed, thanks. --Cayambe 15:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:05, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]