User talk:Der Wolf im Wald/2012

Frankfurt am Main 2011 Skyline origres.jpg

Sie müssen nicht unterschreiben Ihre Bewerbung. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, worauf beziehst du dich bitte genau? -- Wolf im Wald 22:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

brauche Tipp

Hallo Thomas, als Canon-User mit mehr Erfahrung kannst du mir vielleicht weiterhelfen, und zwar: Die von mir bisher ausprobierten Techniken zur Erstellung von Belichtungsfusionen/HDR sowie Panoramas erkennen die Canon-Rohdatenerweiterung CR2 nicht (was auch nicht überraschend ist). Nun frage ich mich, ob es irgendwelche Möglichkeiten gibt, dies zu umgehen, sprich: Die Möglichkeit zu haben, Inputbilder vor der Verarbeitung ohne Komprimierungsverlust bearbeiten zu können. Oder sogar HDR direkt mit CR2 zu erstellen, um danach bearbeiten zu können. Wie sieht das z.B. beim "echten" Photoshop (nie gehabt) aus. Weißt du da näheres? - Gruß A.Savin 20:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, bitte entschuldige die späte Antwort (hatte viel Stress die Tage), also ich mache zwar eigentlich keine HDRs, aber wenn ich ein Canon-RAW verlustfrei in ein kompatibleres Format konvertieren will, greife ich zu 16-bit-TIFF. Mit dem RAW Konverter kannst du die Bilder einfach in dem Format ausgeben. TIFF ist unkomprimiert und auch die Farbtiefe leidet nicht, da die Kamera in 12-BIT aufnimmt und daher 16-BIT nicht schaden. Bei 8-BIT wäre natürlich ein Verlust zu verzeichnen. Zwar können die Dateien beim Transferieren dann auch mal 100MB groß werden, aber ich hoffe mal, dass dein HDR-Programm TIFF akzeptiert und auch mit 16 BIT arbeiten kann (was eigentlich nicht das Problem sein sollte)... Viel Erfolg und Viele Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 14:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Alles klar. Werde das unbedingt mal ausprobieren. Danke dir. - A.Savin 14:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Oper Frankfurt abends 2011-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --S nova 14:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westend Gate Frankfurt 2011-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maintower Frankfurt Rückseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - OVO mit Baum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 18:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - OVO innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 18:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - OVO.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 18:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline

Bin beeindruckt! Von wo ist das aufgenommen? Gruß -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, freut mich! Das ist vom öffentlichen Domturm (Aufgang kostenpflichtig) aus ca. 65m Höhe aufgenommen. Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 23:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Danke, steht ja auch in der Bildbeschreibung habe ich jetzt gesehen:-). -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline 2012-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 22:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Schöner Schein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good for very difficult conditions and ISO 1600 --Carschten 18:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Resonate-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Resonate-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great --Carschten 18:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Resonate-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice image. --JDP90 10:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Rententurm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 21:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Keine progressiven JPEGs

Hallo Der Wolf im Wald, siehe File:Berliner_Siegessäule_2012-04.jpg#filehistory. Progressive JPEGs benötigen sehr viel Speicher beim Skalieren - daher funktioniert die Thumberstellung ab einer gewissen Größe nicht mehr. Verwende möglichst keine progressive Kodierung. OT: Beachte auch meinen Hinweis in Abschnitt #FYI:_zu_.22Belegexemplar_zukommen_zu_lassen.2C_andernfalls_verf.C3.A4llt_diese_Lizenz_g.C3.A4nzlich.22. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 14:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe nun die erforderliche Korrektur an meinen Credits vorgenommen, den obigen Hinweis muss ich übersehen haben, wofür ich mich entschuldige! Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 15:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Ich bitte noch einmal um Entschuldigung, mir war das nicht klar, weil die Lizenz ja vorsieht, dass der Urheber in der von ihm festgelegten Art und Weise genannt werden soll. Kannst du mich vielleicht noch aufklären, warum meine alte Version trotzdem nicht gültig war? Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 15:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

(vorstehendes von meiner Disk. hierher verschoben - antworte einfach nur hier) Hallo nochmal, freut mich, dass du nun reagierst! Hier nur zur JPEG-Geschichte: Was ist dir dabei nicht klar? Ist dir nicht klar, wieso die Server keine Vorschaubilder erstellen können? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 15:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, nein eigentlich bezog ich mich auf den Hinweis zu meinen Credits, habe das vielleicht etwas verwirrend verlinkt. Also weil ich dachte, dass die Lizenz vorsieht, dass der Urheber in der von ihm bestimmten Art und Weise genannt wird... Bezüglich progressive JPEGs dachte ich immer es läge an der hohen Auflösung, mit der die Server nicht fertig werden, aber nun weiß ich es ja besser. :-) Viele Grüße. -- Wolf im Wald 15:54, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Zur Lizenz habe ich dir oben geantwortet. Ja, es lag gewissermaßen an der hohen Auflösung - progressive JPEGs mit kleiner Auflösung funktionieren. Aber eine gewissen Größe (welche das ist, weiß ich nicht) klappt es aber nicht mehr. Da progressive JPEGs immer mal Mal Probleme machen, werden sie in Commons allgemein nicht empfohlen - ist sowieso Geschmackssache, ob man sie bevorzugt. Ich finde es immer recht blöde, wenn ich nicht schnell sehe, wie "scharf" ein Bild nun eigentlich ist und nicht sehe, wann es fertig geladen hat. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 16:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe bislang immer hochauflösende Stitchings als progressive JPEGs hochgeladen, weil ich diese aufgrund der hohen Auflösung stärker komprimiert habe und beim progressiven JPEG dabei weniger Qualität verloren geht, aber künftig werde ich wohl keine progressiven mehr hochladen. Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 16:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Wir haben hier ja auf der Dateiseite sowieso eine herunterskalierte Vorschauversion, daher kommt der Vorteil von progressive-JPEG (schnell ein Vorschaubild zu haben) nicht zum Tragen. Also auf die Qualität hat progressive Abspeicherung eigentlich gar keinen Einfluss (de:JPEG#Progressives_JPEG). Die von mir hochgeladene Version war eine verlustfreie (gleiche Qualität) Umkodierung (von progressiv nach nicht-progressiv/baseline) deiner ersten Version.

Darf ich aus Neugier wissen, wieso du nun eine stärker komprimierte drübergeladen hast? Findest du 15 MB zu groß? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ∇) 16:59, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Ich hatte deine Version nicht bemerkt und bezüglich Komprimierung dachte ich, dass 15MB vielleicht etwas viel sind, weil sich dann schnell die Leute beschweren.. Aber ich kann auch gerne wieder das Foto in ursprünglicher Qualität hochladen. Viele Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 00:07, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zoofenster Fassadendetail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --kallerna 07:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berliner Siegessäule 2012-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:39, 10 May 2012 (UTC).  Comment Well done, it's very sharp! Please check the sky carefully, there are some light dust spots. --Iifar 19:33, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Speicherstadt abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice! --Ralf Roletschek 19:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Lizenzbaustein

Moin Thomas,

du könntest vielleicht daran interessiert sein in Zukunft

als Lizenzbaustein zu nutzen. Dadurch wird deine im Permission-Parameter geforderte Attribution deutlicher und tendenziell eher eingehalten. Zudem erkennt dann "Use this file on the web" diese Attribution. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 07:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Peter, ich habe schon oft überlegt diesen Baustein beim Hochladen zu verwenden, das Problem ist nur, dass er nicht auswählbar ist in der Liste. Wie soll ich da vorgehen? Nach jedem Hochladen manuell ersetzen? Etwas nervig und auch nicht optimal juristisch gesehen.. Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 16:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luminale 2012 - Tanzende Wasser-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Epic. --Mattbuck 20:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline 2012-04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurter Altstadt mit Skyline 2012-04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Speicherstadt abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Speicherstadt abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

QI signature

HI,

I guess you nominate the picture of the Berlins Museum Island and TV tower in QIC, but the bot did not accept your signature, and took mine instead. Would you please sign again ? Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 22:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, that was a mistake, sorry! I fixed it a few seconds ago. Greetings, -- Wolf im Wald 22:46, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Promoted !--Jebulon (talk) 23:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! :-) -- Wolf im Wald 00:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berlin Museumsinsel Fernsehturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good !--Jebulon 23:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 07:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamburg Berliner Tor Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 22:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Bode-Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:18, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandenburg Gate at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Paris 16 (talk) 11:05, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Berliner Tor Center.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

luminale

danke, für deine mail! dontworry (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Gerne. Viele Grüße, -- Wolf im Wald 12:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Your latest FP Candidate: Alte Nationalgalerie abends.jpg

Hallo, Bis auf die Flagge auf dem Dach ist das Bild klasse. Kann man die Flagge nicht wegretuschieren, so dass nur noch der Flaggenmast steht? Gruß -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, ich denke, das ist keine gute Idee, weil dann das Erscheinungsbild des Gebäudes verfälscht würde. So schlimm sind die angesprochenen Bereiche doch auch nicht, oder? Weil bei solchen Langzeitbelichtungen ist so etwas ja nicht zu vermeiden und gehört auch irgendwie dazu. Ich weiß nicht ob es sinnvoll gewesen wäre noch eine kürzere Belichtung mit ISO 3200 oder 6400 zu machen, in der das Problem nicht aufgetaucht wäre. Grüße -- Wolf im Wald 15:19, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Nationalgalerie abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Rathaus München Westseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 18:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alte Nationalgalerie abends (Zuschnitt).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Nationalgalerie abends (Zuschnitt).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 17:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fruchtkasten und Schillerdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brandenburg Gate at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support For me, the bright streetlights on either side detract somewhat from this view of the gate, and while the lights at the right could be easily cropped, removing the lights at left would necessitate also cropping part of the guardhouse. Despite this shortcoming, however, I think this image is best because the lighting on the gate (and especially on the quadriga) is more muted, resulting in less of a washed-out look. cmadler (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Paris 16 (talk) 14:33, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Times are changing... See that 2009 discussion where a nominated image for the scope "Brandenburg Gate at night" had been declined because of the scope, deemed too narrow at that time: Commons:Valued image candidates/Brandenburger Tor abends.jpg. --Myrabella (talk) 08:21, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
  • File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg, the other file in this MVR, was promoted to VI back in May. So if we reject this image, we retain the other. It seems as though you want to demote the other (current) VI in this scope without replacing it? cmadler (talk) 09:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
    • My remark was just for the record, to register that the interpretation of the guidelines has changed between 2009 and now. It is a noticeable evolution of the VIC "jurisprudence", worthy to be pointed out. --Myrabella (talk) 10:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Better exposure control than in the alternative. Marginal value difference. Concerning the scope I am OK with the night scope as the Brandenburger Tor is very notable and has a special night appearance. That would probably also have been my opinion in 2009, if I had voted. But nevertheless interesting observation by Myrabella. --Slaunger (talk) 06:29, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg: +0 (current VI within same scope) <--
2. Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg: +3 
=>
File:Brandenburger Tor nachts.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg: Promoted.

--MrPanyGoff 20:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

--MrPanyGoff 06:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandenburger Tor nachts 2012-07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Königsstuhl und Viktoria-Sicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Seebrücke Sellin abends.jpg

Hi, You should try a nomination at FP with a small crop at the bottom. Great image! Yann (talk) 10:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks! Do you think the new version is OK? Greetings -- Wolf im Wald (de) 13:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seebrücke Sellin abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool. --Alchemist-hp 01:09, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Seebrücke Sellin abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seebrücke Sellin abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seebrücke Sellin nordöstlicher Teil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 05:41, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Illumination of Hohenzollernbrücke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI, of course. --JLPC (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Seebrücke Sellin nordöstlicher Teil.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seebrücke Sellin nordöstlicher Teil.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Elbtunnel Hamburg menschenleer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alter Elbtunnel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alter Elbtunnel Hamburg menschenleer.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alter Elbtunnel Hamburg menschenleer.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Rathaus München Ostseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 06:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Deutsche Bank Headquarters.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutsche Bank Headquarters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maintower Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments First class immage! --THWZ 16:58, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Altes Rathaus (München).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Very good image. I suggest adding "exterior" to scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I corrected the Scope. -- Wolf im Wald (de) 00:23, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

•  Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:43, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape Frankfurt 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gut gemacht! --Iifar 11:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cityscape Frankfurt 2010 panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Gut gemacht! --Iifar 11:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baureihe 189 067-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 14:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DBAG Class 140.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I think so --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:48, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Downtown of Frankfurt am Main.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in very rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:56, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maintower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:57, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 4.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 1.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs maybe a slight perspective correction (the TV tower is not vertical), but it is a QI anyway (if not copyrighted, as it were in France...)!--Jebulon 16:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 182 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CAs, but ok. --Mattbuck 08:42, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 7.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusse violett 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good picture, definitely QI, but there should be the scientific name in the description --DKrieger 17:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC) Genus level ID may enough for a cultivar; but it seems just a crop of an existing FP/QI. -- Jkadavoor 05:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC) Guess it's ok then. Mattbuck 12:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hauptwache Frankfurt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 12:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 3.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 17:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marco-Polo-Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathausturm Hamburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great ! --Jebulon 17:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 6.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 03:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 5.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 03:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Festival of Lights 2012 - Berliner Dom - 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Römerberg Schnee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments schön matschig grau! --Ralf Roletschek 14:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seebrücke Sellin abends crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, this version should be FP instead, it had more support votes. --Iifar 14:17, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schnee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 20:56, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siemens ES 64 F4 - 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 14:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunusturm Baustelle 2012-03-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment slightly overexposed --Rjcastillo 03:12, 10 November 2012 (UTC) I think it's OK for QI. - A.Savin 20:36, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Römerberg Weihnachten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximeg 20:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fruchtkasten und Stiftskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. Good job. --Selbymay 20:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heilig-Geist-Spital abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 20:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Heilig-Geist-Spital abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heilig-Geist-Spital abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Moonik 04:33, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neues Rathaus Hannover abends.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:18, 23 December 2012 (UTC)