User talk:Eusebius/Archives/Promotions/July 2011

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Istanbul Erkek Lisesi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Could be an excellent VI too.--Jebulon 19:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

--Jebulon 19:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinan - Saint-Sauveur vue des remparts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, it's a HDR, bit the image is definitely too gray/it's contrastless/the WB has to be fixed. --Carschten 17:18, 2 July 2011 (UTC) *  Comment The picture is great enough to invest a little more work. Imo the perspektive is not corrected perfectly, there are rests of tilt cw on the left parts and perhaps a slight correction on the right would be nice, too. I don't think it's too grey. --Mbdortmund 01:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the remarks. Picture updated: slight perspective correction, slightly lightened/contrasted. --Eusebius 07:21, 3 July 2011 (UTC) Better now, I really like it. --Mbdortmund 06:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

--Mbdortmund 06:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Istanbul Erkek Lisesi (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support supported by --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Trôo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 07:15, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support better than the 2nd picture --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Shows three wings, from elevated position, and lets recognize the cross plan. --Ikar.us (talk) 11:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Troo02.jpg: +4
2. Trôo - collégiale Saint-Martin.jpg: +1 
=>
File:Troo02.jpg: Promoted.
File:Trôo - collégiale Saint-Martin.jpg: Declined.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bursa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Well, a bit difficult to assess at the review size... This image is interesting because it shows the modern part of the city but some old spires or minarets too; it also illustrates the fact that Bursa is an industrial area; despite the fog(?), one can see the mountainous surrondings. All this is shown more completely than File:Bursa panorama.jpg, File:Bursa-1.jpg or File:View of Bursa from the hills of Mount Uludag.jpg for instance => OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pano Bursa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments not perfect but good --Taxiarchos228 07:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius 12:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Büyük Mecidiye Camii - Ortaköy Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 22:41, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 12:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ortaköy Mosque (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 16:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aix-en-Provence - Pavillon Vendôme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. --Berthold Werner 16:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC) Good quality. --Ianare 00:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 13:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pavillon de Vendôme.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment You might want to add the image to relevant articles (such as the one on the fr wiki). Also I have added a reason to the nom which makes it easier for evaluators to assess the suitability of the scope (it signs with the nom's name automatically). W.S. 15:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I am not active anymore on the Wikipedias, so I am usually reluctant to push my images there when there is already another picture. --Eusebius (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

 Done My pleasure, --Myrabella (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:11, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

--Eusebius (talk) 05:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)