User talk:Jakubhal/Archives/September 2016 - April 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160813 - Shwedagon Pagoda in Yangon, Myanmar - 9998.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160808 Naypyidaw 9054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:45, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 - Sri Ksetra - East Zegu Temple - 9310.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 Aung San statue in Pyay 9566.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:51, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 child Pyain 9601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Face is sharp, and that's what matters --Daniel Case 03:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Inle Lake Myanmar 7574.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments *  Support ok for me now. --Hubertl 09:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Inle Lake Myanmar 7570.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Inle Lake Myanmar 7764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Shwe Indein Pagoda 8061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160527 Ratusz w Zamościu 7323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:34, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Shwe Indein Pagoda 8060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little soft in the top corners, otherwise sharp and nice, although the same can't be said for the poor relief. Overall QI. --W.carter 21:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 - Stray cat - Mandalay Hill - Mandalay, Myanmar - 5862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20160729 - Taungthaman Lake near Amarapura in Myanmar - 6044.jpg[edit]

Please, see notes in File:20160729 - Taungthaman Lake near Amarapura in Myanmar - 6044.jpg--Lmbuga (talk) 22:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Lake corrected. As for the temple, I'm not so sure if lines should be straight. I need to check it, but not today. I will take care of that in a few days. -- Jakubhal 22:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Inle Lake Myanmar 7575.RETOUCHED.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:08, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 - Buledi Temple, Bagan, Myanmar - 6745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Superbass 21:14, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 - Htilominlo Temple, Bagan, Myanmar - 6718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 - Taungthaman Lake near Amarapura in Myanmar - 6044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160729 - Old truck, Mandalay, Myanmar - 5965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2334.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Funny and very good. Could be a good advertising poster for the dance company.--Jebulon 19:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Inle Lake 7434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Myanmar Bagan 6669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 18:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Myanmar Bagan 6721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan temples 6701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 19:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160815 Yangon 0333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160815 Sule Pagoda Yangon 0307.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Geocode would have been nice. --Peulle 14:40, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan 6695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall quality is sufficient for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 21:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Shwe Indein Pagoda 8054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 07:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160731 Bagan 6354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160731 Bagan 6350.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160417 Zamek w Bodzentynie 4863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 22:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161126 Tatry Rakoń 2072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Subjects in focus and not so badly handled in back --Daniel Case 06:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160814 fomer JR train Yangon Circular Railway 0228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo. However people walking on the left part might have been sharper, so a weak support --Michielverbeek 19:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan 6728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 lady with thanaka portrait 6391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Very nice shot! --Smial 12:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan Myanmar 6734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perfect. Thank you! --Smial 12:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan Myanmar 6667.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan Myanmar 6652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160731 Myanmar Bagan Minochantha 6352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 Sehtatgyi Paya Pyay Myanmar 9479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good and a possible FPC nominee, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 09:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160728 Mandalay Palace 5732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Charming image. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 Pyay, Myanmar 9593.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160731 Ananda Temple Bagan Myanmar 6282.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Groupe Tango Sumo - Around - 20160707 1146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160731 Bagan chinthe 6345.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170210 Rynek w Nowym Korczynie 4057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Szydłów 4234.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Szydłów 4279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Szydłów 4306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Kościół w Rakowie 4443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Lech Wałęsa Szydłów 4355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Maria Skłodowska-Curie Szydłów 4358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Brama Krakowska w Szydłowie 4177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160527 Stawy Echo 7633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 01:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - The Trick Brothers - Piggy Circus - 20160710 3986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Widok w stronę Kasprowego Wierchu 1548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2465.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sky is not perfect, but overall, a striking, very good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 11:46, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Szydłów dzwonnica 4397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Tatry Kurtkowiec 1743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2663.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Street theatre can be hard to understand, but at least the photo is ok. Good quality. --W.carter 21:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice and sharp. --W.carter 21:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Troiśniak 1758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Przełęcz Liliowe 1538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Płochacz halny Świnica 1621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments DoF just ok --Poco a poco 21:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Widok ze Świnicy 1664.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160423 Zegar słoneczny Chotel Czerwony 5101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Inle Lake 7438.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Bagan chinthe 6637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 Bangkok Wat Arun 5515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica -Markeliñe - Andante - 20160710 4146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - The Trick Brothers - Piggy Circus - 20160710 3932.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Wisława Szymborska Szydłów 4351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160522 Starorobociański Wierch 7044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice swirly composition. -- Ikan Kekek 22:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2652.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Kurtkowiec i Czerwone Stawy Gąsienicowe 1730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Right side is blurred. You can withdraw photo or make a crop with cutting that right side --Halavar 23:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Jakubhal 21:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 11:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Buddha Bagan 6629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Crop at the bottom could be better. --XRay 12:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170305 Jezioro Czorsztyńskie 4931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 02:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170305 Niedzica zamek 5195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170305 Kinga of Poland Pieniny 5047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Shwe Indein Pagoda 7986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170225 Czysty Protest Kraków 4732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Though the main subject are the demonstrating people, I think the distortion on the buildings nonetheless should be corrected --A.Savin 14:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Corrected --Jakubhal 17:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 01:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Uliczny - Eunika w krainie cyrku - 20160710 4563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160803 Meiktila Lake 7255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, perhaps, but good quality. --Peulle 20:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Przełęcz Liliowe 1534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Kościół św. Ducha w Szydłowie 4423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Szydłów mury miejskie 4173.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Oficyna pałacu w Kurozwękach 4154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Pałac w Kurozwękach 4149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160803 - Meiktila, Myanmar - Phaung Daw U Pagoda - 7306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160814 Maha Bandula Yangon 0276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Zawrat Kasprowy 1352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice image. --Peulle 12:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170225 Czysty Protest Kraków 4803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The picture is a little dark, think you can brighten it a bit? --W.carter 23:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Corrected --Jakubhal 15:45, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! That looks nice. Good quality. --W.carter 20:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160810 Sri Ksetra 9216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Geocode would have been nice. --Peulle 12:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jakubhal, please fix at least 3 very light dust spots not far from the top margin, roughly in the center. -- Ikan Kekek 13:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I think I've found all. If you see more please note them --Jakubhal 20:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think you got them all. -- Ikan Kekek 23:19, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Zamek w Szydłowie 4285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 21:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Sucha Przełęcz 2670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 02:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2471.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Krakowski Teatr Tańca - Estra & Andro - 20160708 2421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - The Trick Brothers - Piggy Circus - 20160710 3963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Shwe Indein Pagoda 8104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Shwe Indein Pagoda 8110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161230 Kasprowy Wierch 2443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enmough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Kozy w Kurozwękach 4128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good image. Is it possible to get the species name in the categories?--Peulle 21:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As for species, it is in subcategory of Capra aegagrus hircus. As for breed, I cannot help. I've just checked several goat pictures, but nothing looks similar for me, so I put it in unidentified goats subcategory.--Jakubhal 21:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)  Support I see it now; they have put "goats" as a subcategory.--Peulle 18:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161001 Kasprowy Wierch 1540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail and DoF --Daniel Case 06:07, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 29. Ulica - Circus Ferus - Serce Polski - 20160707 1314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good use of DoF. Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Shwe Indein Pagoda 7985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170211 Kościół w Szydłowie 4408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160806 Inle Lake 8636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160806 Inle Lake temple 8606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Clipped trees a little distracting, but temple looks good --Daniel Case 05:58, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160727 Grand Palace Bangkok 5405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice detail. I like the people ... I know those two guys aren't about to fight, but they look like they are --Daniel Case 21:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170402 Jelcz 315M Krakow 5835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality although somewhat small --Code 18:32, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170401 kozica Kończysty Wierch 5522.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160801 Irrawaddy River Bagan 6788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gorgeous and an FP, too, in my opinion, if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek 19:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160806 Inn Oo Pagodas Inle Myanmar 8617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160806 Inn Oo Pagodas Inle Myanmar 8612.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]