User talk:Kulac

please leave me messages here!

copy-paste

DescriptionKulac	Cydia splendana English:  ? Deutsch: Später Kastanienwickler Location: Graz, Austria Camera: Nikon D2X Lens: Sigma 150mm/2.8 EX DG APO IF Makro AF-S VR Nikkor 300 mm 1:2,8 IF-ED with TC-20E II converter Focal Length: 150 mm Exposure: 1/180 sec, f/22 Film / Speed: ISO 400 Comment: identification: Lepiforum ([1])
Date	8 August 2006
Source	Own work
Author	picture taken by Kurt Kulac English: Please report references to kulacgmx.at. Deutsch: Quellenangabe und Beleg an kulacgmx.at erbeten.

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:

You may select the license of your choice.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Andreas Waldherr Lavanttal Rallye 2009 2.jpg, which was nominated by Lycaon at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Andreas Waldherr Lavanttal Rallye 2009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Misumena vatia male01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 14:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raimund Baumschlager Lavanttal Rallye 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Klasse! --Ralf Roletschek 20:45, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicindela hybrida senne01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Kulac, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

FYI: Used your media file

This is a courtesy note. One of your media files is featured in a new commercial eBook in Apple’s iBooks store: http://itunes.apple.com/us/book/dr.-kemps-kids-love-bugs/id497852225?mt=11

I’ve contributed images to Wikipedia for over seven years now (including several POTD and Featured Images) and I designed the WikiSpecies logo. I respect your work here and the CC-BY-SA license we all labor under.

I know commercializing Wikipedia work is tricky and so I’ve taken great pains to follow your CC-BY-SA license requirements. I also plan to donate 10% of my proceeds to the Wikimedia Foundation directly. This is the very first self-published e-book created with Apple’s new tools and sold in the store.

I’ve given your file a credit line in the “Image and Video Credits” section starting at page 24 as required here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License

This compilation features many of the finest Wikipedia media files in their exact form and not as derivative works. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verbatim_copying_under_the_GFDL#Making_verbatim_copies_of_images

If I did alter your work -- such as cutting out an insect part or adding a video sound track -- I shared a Share Alike version of the new media in a DRM-free format and listed the web address in the credits section.

Thank you very much for uploading your work to Wikipedia and releasing it for the world to use in enriching educational formats.

-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeremykemp

thanks for the info. --Kulac (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Colostygia aqueata Buchstein01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Colostygia aqueata Buchstein01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siona lineata (Black-veined Moth) Female, while deploying its eggs..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption is very poor. there is no geododage. The scope should be attached to the category. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

fixed. --Kulac (talk) 09:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I changed the scope. Look at the syntax. There is a gallery for this butterfly is even better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 16:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gomphocerippus rufus03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 09:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pseudopanthera macularia kermeter01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 09:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nicrophorus humator01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me--Lmbuga 19:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choerades fimbriata01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Florstein 16:36, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Imagesin QI

The three images in IQ are very good and very useful. But they are slightly under exposed you could correct it?

• Oniscus asellus Furlbachtal01.jpg
• Cercopis vulnerata moosheide01.jpg
• Aphrophora alni03.jpg

Best regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

hi! sorry, but i don´t think that more brightness will be good for the pictures. did you try that out? best regards, --Kulac (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

The scientific point of view, they are good. But the esthetic point of view they are a bit dark, and it does not capture the attention in a stream of images as IQ. It is very easy to change by increasing the light only in the midtones. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

i added some brightness to 1. and 2. you were right, they look better now. but the 3. one is still ok for me. the white background is otherways to dominating. best regards, --Kulac (talk) 19:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oniscus asellus Furlbachtal01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cercopis vulnerata moosheide01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aphrophora alni03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--Vassil 12:36, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clematis alpina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 12:28, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tatra 813 truck trial voitsberg 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA and overexposure (white parts), nevertheless nice and impressive--ArildV 13:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thisanotia chrysonuchella podgorje 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:10, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argynnis niobe podgorje 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --Danny S. 18:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aporia crataegi (Black-veined White) mating..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Interesting picture but there is confusion between the scope which must be short and precise and the Reason field, which allows aporter of precisions. The scope should be: Aporia crataegi (Black-veined White) mating. and "you can see the pupa of the female in the background" in the field reason. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melitaea britomartis podgorje01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zygaena loti podgorje 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aporia crataegi (Black-veined White) eggs on Crataegus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Picture interesting but lacks the categorization: Aporia crataegi. And it would be helpful if the scope refers to this category or better with the gallery. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

the picture ist linked in the gallery of Aporia crataegi. i will never understand the benefit of additionally categorizing the images in addition. but feel free, to do so, i will not mind. --Kulac (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Support I had the same idea as long as you, but it happens more and more image they shall be classified and make it quickly usable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I think the scope should be Aporia crataegi (Black-veined White) eggs. Yann (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 08:44, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
mating couple of Phymata crassipes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very Useful. You are a great specialist. Of Heteroptera, of course :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philaeus chrysops podgorje 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:21, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Nur zur Info! :)

Moin! Anstatt eine Datei zweimal unter unterschiedlichen Namen hochzuladen und dann eine als Speedy Deletion zu kennzeichen haben wir eine Vorlage: {{rename|NeuerDateiname.xxx|2}} wobei die 2 am Ende fuer richtigen oder klaren Dateinamen steht. So macht das ganze weniger Arbeit. :-) Vielen Dank fuer die tollen Fotos! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

danke! ich hab die dateien allerdings mit "move" verschoben. war also zumindest auf meiner seite kaum mehrarbeit. wenn das beim löschen aufs gleiche kommt, wärs also egal. lg, --Kulac (talk) 21:22, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Jein. Was am Ende rauskommt zaehlt... :-)) Macht das Leben fuer Admins einfacher, die Fileverschieber machen das mit einem Klick. Dann haben wir nicht soviele SD abzuarbeiten. Bleibt viel liegen, 40.000 Files ohne Quellenangaben zb. :) Wie gesagt, war nur zur Info. Beide Wege sind OK. Kanndu machen wie willdu, sagt das Haeschen. :) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 21:34, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

ok, danke für die info. lg, --Kulac (talk) 04:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xestia ashworthii Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elseid Hysaj01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments no doubt --Herzi Pinki 10:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arctia caja Buchstein02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Herzi Pinki 10:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephenemyia stimulator Bohemian Forest01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --ANGELUS 00:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aplocera praeformata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --ANGELUS 00:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acleris forsskaleana Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --ANGELUS 00:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
a mating pair of Anarta myrtilli on its hostplant..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I gave the image in the right list. I placed in the gallery. I changed the scope to attach it to the gallery. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entephria caesiata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not that bad, but too noisy IMO. --Hockei 17:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)  New version uploaded with less noise and chromatic noise. @Kulac: If you don't like the new version, you can revert it--Lmbuga 22:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)  Support Much better. --Hockei 16:27, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christoph Martschinko U21 Austria vs. Albania 2014-03-05 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trombidium holosericeum Woblitz01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomas Strakosha01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arbnor Fejzullahu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrrhocoris apterus (Firebug), a freshly molted nymph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvis Prençi01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorcus parallelipipedus Woblitz01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

File:Deileptenia ribeata Buchstein01.jpg

Hi Kulac. Sorry I hadn't had the time to work on this. I will try to do so within a few weeks. Cheers. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 00:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scopula nigropunctata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puengeleria capreolaria Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - QI for me. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xanthorhoe montanata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catocala nupta Graz01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments in my opinion QI, great work --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calliteara fascelina Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deileptenia ribeata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --J. Lunau 13:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymantria monacha Buchstein01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Cccefalon 05:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcis repandata Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality ok. --Cccefalon 05:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anaplectoides prasina Buchstein01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 18:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Magst dich vielleicht dazu äußern?

Das wäre meiner Meinung nach eine mögliche Lösung eines Problems, welches von den Knipsern überhaupt nicht verstanden wird.--Hubertl (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liam Hemsworth at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)  Comment.Is it not a bit too dark? -- Spurzem 21:54, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirjam Weichselbraun at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality despite this conditions. --Hubertl 09:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jennifer Lawrence at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The EXIF data tell me, that it is a scan and not a photography. --Cccefalon 18:02, 17 June 2015 (UTC) Weak  Support as I cannot judge, if some minor quality flaws are about the choosen ISO rate. Thank you Hubertl, for ruling out the scanning issue. --Cccefalon 20:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris Berben at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 15:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prozessionskapelle Werfenweng 25308 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jennifer Lawrence at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conchita Wurst at 214. Wetten, dass.. show in Graz, 8. Nov. 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich

... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an infowikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über vereinwikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, ist ein Bild von Dir: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich

... fürs Mitmachen!

Vielen Dank für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich. Die Jury hat entschieden und die diesjährigen Preisträger wurden veröffentlicht: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/.

In etwa einem halben Jahr findet mit Wiki Loves Earth (http://wikilovesearth.at/) der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich statt, bei dem es um Naturdenkmäler geht. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du auch an diesem Wettbewerb wieder teilnimmst.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016

Servus Kulac,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie  ^Disk    15:07, 5 May 2016 (CET)

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)