User talk:Liance

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Liance!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

DR nomination spree

Your nomination spree has been a fairly disruptive. Please note that Wikimedia Commons isn't here solely to serve as a media repository for the Wikipedia's. Noting that an image isn't being used on Wiki is therefore irrelevant. See COM:SCOPE. Please use {{Duplicate}} in the future for marking duplicate files. A fair number of the image you marked were in scope, but were still deleted due to them being a copyright violation. Please familiarize yourself with copyright law over at the copyright casebook. You might like to enable the GoogleImages tab in your list of gadgets to more easily do a reverse image search to check if a work had previously been published elsewhere. --Vera ^(talk) 15:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I do realize that Wikimedia Commons is not solely for the Wikis. I will familiarize myself with the copyright law and will review the scope guidleline, thank you for pointing this out and giving me this advice. Liance (talk) 15:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Just one more thing - could you please show me some examples of the pictures that were in scope? Sorry about asking this, but I was just wondering if I could see them and avoid making those mistakes in the future. Liance (talk) 15:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

I just went through a series of your DR nominations at Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/12/03. I don't have a problem with your thinking that a group of images were out of scope when most Admins will think they are OK -- you'll learn that fast if you look back at your DRs after they are closed. As an example, the image of the two people in Minecraft costumes, which you nominated as out of scope, was perfectly in scope, but was a copyvio.

I do have a problem with wrong facts. In many of them you said the image was not in use in any WP articles. In fact, almost all of them were in use on user pages and your nomination had the facts wrong. Images that are in use are automatically in scope. The only exception is that we do not keep images that are in use only on user pages of users who are not contributors -- an image that is a user's only edit will be deleted.

If you are going to to DRs regularly, it is very important that you get the facts right. A dozen Admins do almost all of 1,500 deletions a day. We work very fast and it slows us down considerably when we can't trust a nominator to have gotten the facts right. When you say that an image is not in use, please be sure that is actually correct. If it's in use only on the user page of a one edit drive-by contributor, then say so, but please don't say that it is not in use. If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Liance,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

?

Remember that your own personal bias is the cause of all future events. Always remember that actions have consequences sir/madaam. It all started with you though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inukishu (talk • contribs) 15:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Inukishu Care to elaborate? Not sure what you're trying to convey here. Liance (talk) 02:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Dideye diti

So you know how you set my page that I didn't even know existed for my comic that I uploaded to Wikipedia for deletion? Remember how it's because it's from a copyrighted website? Or how about the fact you didn't even contact me on the site that I'm literally active on instead of letting somebody give me a warning on a website I didn't even know existed? Cuz I would have told you, that's my website. That's my comic. Looking at that website for even just a second would show you that specific comic isn't even on that website because I haven't used that website for over 2 years. You would have noticed that that image is only found online on Reddit from oh, guess what? My Reddit account. ChiserYT (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2022 (UTC)