User talk:Magog the Ogre
 |
Hello, Magog the Ogre. You have new messages at info por favor's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
 |
English: This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Español: Este usuario está atareado en la vida real y puede que no pueda responder a las preguntas con rapidez.
|
 |
English: Before posting, please check:
If I have left a message on another talk page (such as your user talk), please do not bring the discussion to my page unless necessary. Please respond on your own page and leave a notice with the {{tb}} template on my page to let me know that you've responded there. If you leave me a message, I will respond here; if you'd like, feel free to ask and I will let you know with the {{Talkback}} template on your talk page. Thanks. Español: Antes de dejar un mensaje, favor de comprobar:
Si yo le dejo un mensaje en otra página (tal como su página de usuario discusión), favor de no traer la discusión a esta página. Favor de responder allí y avisarme aquí con la plantilla {{tb}}. Si me dejas un mensaje, te responderé aquí; si quieres, pídeme que coloque la plantilla {{Talkback}} en tu página de discusión. Gracias. |
|
Cleanup script suggesion [edit]
Suggest that if a description page contains the template {{LicenseReview}}, that template be moved to the "Permission" field of {{Information}}. Kelly (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- No, this license review tag should be placed near the coypright tag and nowhere else. Both should be placed under the license header (in an ideal world). --Denniss (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Not done - this would garner too much opposition, and all of the bot's edits need to be non-controversial. However, I might be able to write something up that would tag the image as needing license review, or needing Flickr review. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Not done - this would garner too much opposition, and all of the bot's edits need to be non-controversial. However, I might be able to write something up that would tag the image as needing license review, or needing Flickr review. Bot [edit]
I notice your bot is changing dates as follows: 4 May 2013 to 2013-05-04. Is this policy here as I deliberately set them long so that I know it is 4 May and not 5 April. The other way confuses us in England. Philafrenzy (talk) 19:10, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- When the date field of the {{Information}} template is set to dddd-dd-dd format, it is automatically parsed into the user's local language as the full string date. In your case, if you look at the page as it is rendered, rather than look at the wikitext, you will see a properly formatted date. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ah. OK. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
migration = review [edit]
See this. "Cleanup TS" added "migration = review" to a {{GFDL-1.2}} file. You can test by using "cleanup TS" again on the current revision of the file information page: the script will try to readd it. GFDL 1.2 files are always ineligible for review, so no review parameters are needed. --Stefan4 (talk) 20:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
