User talk:Multicherry

Uhm, really strange. Maybe it's a problem related to the servers (sometimes it's not too fast to update the category, what links here and the other special pages where there are a lot of changes ;-) I can only guess by the way. Regards, --Filnik^Rock! 13:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. Actually, I think it may be due to the ISP caching stuff too, as it loaded okay from another ISP. Strange.... Multicherry 01:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

I think that the images are tagged in the right way now, don't worry ;-) --Filnik^Rock! 15:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

File:Prinztronic-tournament-colour-programmable-2000.jpg

I agree with your changes. I would like to let you know that I have created this page (it:Serie PC-50x) that use your photo. May be you can also upload the photo of your cartrige? --Arosio Stefano (talk) 15:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

(Reply at user's page; I'd normally reply here, but it's been almost a year since I used this account, so wish to draw user's attention to it). Multicherry (talk) 19:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Very, very, very intresting photos. Thank you. I already use some of them (here it:Serie PC-50x and (it:AY-3-8500)). My only fear is that the tree photos of the games are not suitable for the commons licence (there aren't videogames tv images in commons). (talk) 11:39, 25 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arosio Stefano (talk • contribs)

Sorry for not responding sooner. My understanding is that images of very simple games like this are not copyrightable because they fall below the Threshold of originality, i.e. the graphics are basic non-copyrightable elements (rectangles, lines and squares) arranged in a simple manner that purely purely reflects the game function. (Other Pong screenshots on Commons use the same reasoning). Multicherry (talk) 21:44, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raspberry Pi 2 Model B v1.1 top new (bg cut out).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 07:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raspberry Pi 2 Model B v1.1 underside new (bg cut out).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment This one looks overexposed, there’s too much of glare on the solder points for me. Possible to develop a less exposed version? --Kreuzschnabel 07:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)  Comment You make a fair point, but it's not something that's fixable on this version of the image- it'd have to be rephotographed at some future date. Multicherry 19:06, 24 February 2015 (UTC)  Fixed Figured out it could be done, not sure whether this improves it or not, but decide for yourselves. Multicherry 19:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)  Support OK for me now. --Kreuzschnabel 10:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nokia 3310 grey front (tidied and enhanced).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atari 1020 plotter (angle) (shadow).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Atari 800XL photos

Hi! I have written some articles for German Wikipedia, mainly for 8-bit computers. Of course I have noticed your excellent work :o) Unfortunately there are no photos available showing top, side and rear view of the Atari 800XL computer I have written an article for already (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_800XL ). Perhaps you may shoot some pics? Also a photo of the 800XLmainboard (top view) would be cool. Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 13:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@Schnurrikowski:

Thank you for the kind words. Also, thank you for your contributions to that article which (using Google Translate) appear to be substantial, and much more in-depth than the English-language version!

Unfortunately, there are two problems with the photographs you request. One is that my 800XL has some quite bad yellowing (which *might* be fixable in Photoshop) and some other wear.

The other problem is that it's currently stored elsewhere and I don't have immediate access to it.

However, I will bear this in mind the next time it is possible for me to do this. All the best, and thanks again for your contributions!

Multicherry (talk) 23:52, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Yellowing is not a big deal - there are people at German Wikipedia who can 'bleach' nearly everything ;o) Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 12:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

@Schnurrikowski: ; Yes, I can do that myself- both of my 130XE images and the images of the Phonemark and XC12 data recorders have had yellowing removed.

IIRC I didn't think it was worth the effort at the time, as there were photos of 800XLs in better condition already on Commons. Also, my one had other cosmetic issues in addition to the yellowing.

I'll bear your request in mind for the future, but as I mentioned, it's not possible at present as I don't currently have access to it.

All the best, Multicherry (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

@Schnurrikowski: ; File:Atari 800XL board top (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg, File:Atari 800XL joystick ports (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg and others in the set may be of interest. The motherboard pictures are alright, but not great; the others are closer to snapshots for reasons I won't bore you with.

In hindsight, I probably should have planned it out better, and wish I'd taken off the cartridge slot from the motharboard. However, I don't want to risk taking my 800XL apart again (it was slightly more work than expected!)

Note that File:Atari 800XL and 130XE (rear view) (new).jpg and File:Atari-800XL-Back.jpg (uploaded after you left your comment) show the back of the 800XL, so there probably isn't any need for another one.

All the best, Multicherry (talk) 23:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for all efforts. Highly appreciated! Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 14:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

@Schnurrikowski: No problem. I've uploaded new versions of File:Atari 800XL joystick ports (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg, File:Atari 800XL top (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg and File:Atari 800XL bottom (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg, and some other images, but they're still not outstanding. It's not as if it's the most pristine 800XL in existence, so I didn't worry too much about something that wasn't going to be perfect anyway.

If someone wants pristine images of the 800XL, it would be preferable to photograph a better-preserved example than to spend too much time Photoshopping those. (That's why I hadn't bothered uploading images of it previously). That said, they're a fairly comprehensive document of that revision of the 800XL. Multicherry (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

@Schnurrikowski: Also; File:Atari 800XL front left (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg, File:Atari 800XL rear without parallel cover (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg, File:Atari 800XL rear with parallel cover (72RHA AT8489594 I-474).jpg. Multicherry (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Wow! What a surprise! The pics need some refinement though. I put them in the "Fotowerkstatt" in German Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fotowerkstatt), so someone can polish everything up :o) Thanks again and best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

@Schnurrikowski: ; If you think they're worth the effort, why don't you attempt it yourself? I did warn you when you made the request that my 800XL wasn't (cosmetically) in the best condition and that it would probably make more sense to find a better example. That's why I didn't bother Photoshopping them myself.

And I don't think the board photograph needs any more work. It's a bit dusty (and I was not going to risk damaging my 800XL by removing that), but I don't think that can be easily Photoshopped out without disturbing the accuracy. Multicherry (talk) 14:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

I just don't have the time currently. Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 15:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again! I will add imagemaps with the enhanced pics to the arcticle soon. Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 08:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Everything is done! Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 10:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikon F60 (top and front) (retouched).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casio W-86 digital watch (front closeup minor retouch).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Resolution could be higher, but OK --Peulle 13:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atari XC12 Cassette Data Recorder (angled retouched).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 04:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casio fx-83ES calculator (front) (minor retouch).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Kaga tau 17:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Titan watch...

I have disassembled my watch....there is this glass thing got broken....i really love this watch..how should I find another glass piece... 103.24.21.138 17:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

@103.24.21.138: - Unfortunately, I am not an expert in watch repair and I can't help with this. Sorry about that. Multicherry (talk) 18:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casio F-91W watch (2023) (front closeup - time) (minor retouch).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)