User talk:Poco a poco/2017-09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Támesis, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 077.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Two dust spots at the top left and a few above the Shard. --King of Hearts 01:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 07:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 Support --King of Hearts 02:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dust spot about 2/3 of the way to the right. --King of Hearts 01:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 07:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 Support --King of Hearts 02:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are CAs on the right border, one on a person, the other on a white post, could you remove them please? --Basotxerri 15:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 01:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peñón de Gibraltar, 2015-12-09, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Khajou, Isfahán, Irán, 2016-09-20, DD 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plasencia de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa de Regla, Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 20:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de África, Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa Paraíso, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Río Dynjandisá, Vestfirðir, Islandia, 2014-08-14, DD 117.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roca de la Ley, Parque Nacional de Þingvellir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 035.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de la estación depuradora, Puerto de Sagunto, España, 2015-01-04, DD 89.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre del Oro, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 72.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torreón Malladeta, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storhofthi, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 121.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:41, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Atienza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 146.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trasobares, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-02, DD 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tortuera, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. (Please add the geo location.) --XRay 04:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done and also added it to the category, that is rather the place where it matters. IMHO investing time in geodating this kind of images is pointless as soon as the data in Commons is structured with help of Wikidata Poco a poco 05:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torrubia, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. (Please add the geo location.) --XRay 04:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done and also added it to the category, that is rather the place where it matters. IMHO investing time in geodating this kind of images is pointless as soon as the data in Commons is structured with help of Wikidata Poco a poco 05:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torremocha del Pinar, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. (Please add the geo location.) --XRay 04:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done and also added it to the category, that is rather the place where it matters. IMHO investing time in geodating this kind of images is pointless as soon as the data in Commons is structured with help of Wikidata Poco a poco 05:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de Piedra, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. Minor CAs at the statue. Geo location would be nice. --XRay 15:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Geodata added, couldn't see the CA, though Poco a poco 05:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Goce Delcev, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de Piedra, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 95.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Preah Khan, Angkor, Camboya, 2013-08-17, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pucará de Lasana, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 017-019 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 017-019 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Río Moscova, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 16-17 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Río Moscova, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 16-17 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:36, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Villanueva de Huerva, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Quito desde El Panecillo, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 34-37 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vivel del Río Martín, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta Mariacka, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisac, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 99.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santuario de El Quinche, El Quinche, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Cuart, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 89.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Vejer de la Frontera, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 52.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 11:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roca de la Ley, Parque Nacional de Þingvellir, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-16, DD 006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Varas-Chile1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paisaje en Reserva Nacional Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 51-56 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 63-65 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio Khor Virap, Armenia, 2016-10-01, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 04:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Alicante, España, 2014-07-04, DD 90.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Tiflis, Georgia, 2016-09-29, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista del Puerto de Victoria desde Sky100, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 06:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen!

Beste Poco a poco,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre del Reloj, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 2013-08-11, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support The tower is good, but the banner in the background is overexposed. --XRay 04:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Cuart, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 104.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support The building is sharp, so it's good enough. But at the left it is unsharp. I wouldn't crop this part out. --XRay 04:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naghsh-e rostam, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 01-05 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.PumpkinSky 02:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transporte por cable de minerales, Devnya, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please check for CAs. I added a note. --XRay 04:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 04:31, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 SupportOK now. --XRay 05:24, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita de Nasirolmolk, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal de la Municipalidad, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 76-78 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lécera, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

QI candidate review

Hello! Sorry for disturbing you but can you review my QI nomination once more again? Yesterday I uploaded a new version of File:Constitution Square 28 windows.jpg with encreased sharpness. Thank you in advance. --Lystopad (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. I'm just a newcomer in photography who trying make better shots than now I make. And your opinion was helpful for me:) --Lystopad (talk) 21:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Lystopad that's the right way to take it, take note, learn and improve, keep it up! Poco2 21:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. DoF looks like small, but it's f/10. Very minor CAs at the ship at the right. --XRay 05:32, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oficinas salitreras de Humberstone y Santa Laura, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta vieja, Barrio Moro, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 06:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 87.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacsayhuamán, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa Paraíso, Villajoyosa, España, 2014-07-03, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torres de Cuart, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 99.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendedor de melones, Qom, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sala Westminster, Palacio de Westminster, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-07, DD 016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 18 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisac, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 100.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playa de la Punta Roja, Marsella, Francia, 2016-06-22, DD 05-09 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Nikhil B 08:10, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 34.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 34.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storhofthi, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 126.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerto Natales, Chile1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gorgeous! Very good quality. Perhaps FPC? -- Johann Jaritz 06:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta Árabe del Agua, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torrubia, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting concept. Good quality --Crisco 1492 12:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de los Clérigos, Oporto, Portugal, 2012-05-09, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santuario de Las Lajas, Ipiales, Colombia, 2015-07-21, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Persépolis, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 07:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 10-12 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 64-66 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 61-63 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 58-60 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tortuga gigante de San Cristóbal (Chelonoidis chathamensis), isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Bolshói, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 42-43 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:19, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo Estatal de Historia, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 46-47 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please fix the dust spot to the left of the top of the right-hand tower. There's also a rainbow-like penumbra of color noise above the building to the left that would be much better corrected. I think this is probably a QI now, as it's otherwise very good, but I'd like to see what it looks like after you work on it a little more. -- Ikan Kekek 11:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Fixed It looks defintely much better now, thank you. Actually, I like this shot also very much. Poco a poco 14:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, Poco. It's not perfect, but it is better and I think it's a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 18:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Basilio, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 05-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremlin y río Moscova, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 22-27 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There's a big circle of light that's close to lampposts but not actually related to any of them. Please get rid of that. There are also a couple of funny streaks of light in the upper right corner, and another circle of light, clearly visible even at full size on my laptop, above the bridge. I don't think this photo is a QI until all such stray lights are dealt with, but if you fix them all, I think this is a possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek 09:46, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Fixed Ikan, I'll always fix all problems mentioned here in my images (as long as I see them). Indeed, in this image there were some lens flares I didn't see. They are originated by the strong lamps pointing to the camera. Thank you again! Poco a poco 14:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
You're welcome. The photo looks a lot better, so I'm promoting it. I'm noticing more things that you could consider working on, though. There's a lot of color noise starting close to the near left margin of the water, but it can't be seen except at full size. Overall, a great job, IMO, and a really striking scene. -- Ikan Kekek 18:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Pashkov, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 36-37 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Certainly a QI, and maybe an FP. -- Ikan Kekek 09:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
I agree this time with you, probably the best one from my Moscow series Poco a poco 13:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Podalirio ibérica (Iphiclides feisthamelii), Añón, España, 2012-08-27, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
This is quite spectacular. Do you consider this an FP? Let me know. If you do, I will consider nominating it if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
I think that the subject, detail and composition would be FP-worthy but the resolution is just too small Poco a poco 11:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
OK. -- Ikan Kekek 06:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
I agree, though the tails are brilliantly captured. Charlesjsharp 09:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
I just realized that I actually gave it a try 5 years ago, the result is here...Poco a poco 14:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 11-14 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gobierno Estatal de Baviera, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación Central de FF.CC., Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 21-23 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Picadero de Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 40-41 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente de Neptuno, Antiguo Jardín Botánico, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 18-20 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 09-11 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 06:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento de Guerra, Jardín del Patio, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gobierno Estatal de Bavaria, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 05:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Incompatible with Facebook's terms

Hey, I see tags on your works' description pages saying "This file has been released under a license which is incompatible with Facebook's licensing terms. It is not allowed to upload this file to Facebook." Can you elaborate on this? Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 13:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello User:Mhhossein, well, to be more precise, I don't know any terms from Facebook stating clearly what rights do they have on the images and videos uploaded on their site, there is a vacuum there IMHO, and I don't understand why and in which direction they can use it, but surely it is for their benefit not for ours. The main problem I see here is that nobody in the site cares about copyright and having material uploaded there would just guide to have tones of examples (an there are already thousands) of pictures of mine without any credit and without documenting the CC license I use. I do upload (rarely) images from my Canon to Facebook but in tiny size and usually with a watermark. What is your opinion on this? Poco2 08:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Poc: I see, you've devised an scheme to avoid your photos being uploaded without crediting you. But is not the Facebook management responsible for any possible cases of Copyvio, considering the location of their servers? --Mhhossein talk 09:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
User:Mhhossein, look, I estimate that my pictures are used about 700,000 in the net as only every sixth gives credit (and there are about 120,000 credited). I will not be chasing all those in Facebook using the images without fulfilling the license. I usually only do that with professional sites and national newspapers (without much success, though). Poco2 10:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
That's disappointing but I hope you don't get disappointed and keep on taking your fantastic photos. They're really admirable. Thank you for putting time on this discussion. --Mhhossein talk 13:42, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Ad.:Horizontal perspective correction of File:Window of Maison Gaugiran.jpg

Hello, yes, I tried, but I can't do it. I use the Lightroom. If you feel like it I can send you the RAW file. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Tournasol7, I don't need the RAW file for this. I could fix it easily with the JPEG. The horinzontal perspective correction may be required if you took a picture of a form with horizontal lines but the plane of your camera was not parallel to the surface you take picture of, but rather a bit angled to the left or right. If you use Lightroom you should give it a try on your own. The correction of horizontal perspective issues is done with the bar just below the correction of verticals one. You cannot miss it. You should then play around left and right and will then see that in one direction the problem gets fixed and in the other direction gets worse. You can also use other more automatic approaches like the "Level" option (button over the bars). Here you have some information about all this. Good luck! :) Poco2 07:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Poco a poco! I tried a few ones and every time I can not set well verticals and horizontals in the same time... Tournasol7 (talk) 14:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Goluchow, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento de Montreal, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque del castillo de Goluchow, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments An excellent sphere photo --Michielverbeek 06:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la Unidad de Italia, Trieste, Italia, 2017-04-15, DD 11-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The middle part lacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 06:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
True, but I still believe that the ✓ new version is QI, please, have a look Poco a poco 18:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC) Comment o.k. now.--Ermell 21:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Kórnik, Kórnik, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Pashkov, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 38-39 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Looks underexposed by about 1/3 to 2/3 stops. Alos not sure about the noice, as i've got a new OLED Monitor.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 02:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ New version Poco a poco 16:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:36, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Acceptable quality. Stretches out a bit at top, but given the angle I doubt that was avoidable. --Crisco 1492 06:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 13-18 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 28-36 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 07-11 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center| This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Notre-Dame de Montréal Basilica has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 01-06 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good Quality --Shishir 18:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail. Guanaco 21:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 04:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 20-22 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 21:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de Augusto y ayuntamiento, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 68-70 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You are a true globetrotter. Amazing where you go. Excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Templo de Augusto, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 71-73 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antifeatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de Pula, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Trieste, Italia, 2017-04-15, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:35, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa Bernheimer, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2017-07-07, DD 15-17 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antifeatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 49-57 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Dust spot on the sky (see the note) --Halavar 10:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Removed Poco a poco 17:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Support Good now. QI for sure! --Halavar 11:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center| This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Panoramic view of Montreal, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Panoramic view of Montreal has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Santed, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de Santo Domingo, Lécera, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 103-105 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, but the cross is tilted ;-) --Moroder 14:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre de la iglesia de San Martín de Tours, Torrellas, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-23, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monasterio de la Monjía, Golmayo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa fuerte de Vega de Arias, Tierzo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-25, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posada de los Comuneros, Molina de Aragón, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-25, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Ntra. Sra. de la Junquera, Luesma, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rollo de Justicia, Rioseco de Soria, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción, Terrer, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-24, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please correct the undefined category link. --Basotxerri 15:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done, sorry, Poco a poco 14:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miedes de Atienza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 32-35 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castellar de la Muela, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hombrados, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Roque, Mantiel, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Megina, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comercios en la calle Front, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beluga Point, Anchorage, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle histórica Creek, Ketchikan, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-16, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:39, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)