Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pelecanus crispus (Dalmatian Pelican - Krauskopfpelikan) - Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2012-01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pelecanus crispus (Dalmatian Pelican - Krauskopfpelikan) - Weltvogelpark Walsrode 2012-01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2013 at 05:55:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created & uploaded by Fiorellino - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 05:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 05:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 14:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the vignetting/flash effect (see QI CR); I also think the flash is too direct, sometimes it causes a too flat lighting and it also makes some disturbing reflections on the Pelecanus (those reflections would be much softer or inexistent without that flash). --Kadellar (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Very nice and a positive example that the use of flash is also useful for animal photography. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose As per Kadellar. I don't really agree with flash-photography for such subjects unless it's really needed e.g. for nocturnal animals.Fotoriety (talk) 00:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo -- George Chernilevsky talk
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Arcalino (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 16:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose for a lack of resolution (ok but not excellent) combined with the flash problems (strange shadows in the feathers). Either problem alone would be acceptable imo - if the flash resulted in excellent sharpness. --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose I share Kadellar's comments and wonder why the reflexion at the water was cut, the mark is in general too close to the subject Poco a poco (talk) 12:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support A bit small nevertheless (downsampled ?) --Jebulon (talk) 17:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support looks good --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds