Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wendelstein 20090320 SK 002.jpg

File:Wendelstein 20090320 SK 002.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2009 at 14:23:04

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Simonizer (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Simonizer (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support No visible CA, very little noise, and the white balance looks good to my eye. I think the composition could be a little better, but it's not a big issue here. --Notyourbroom (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support An intersting place.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment - Being Simonizer the master of composition, there must be some logical explanation for this one being somehow unbalanced. Was it the only possible shooting spot? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • •  Comment No it was not. But it was the only spot on the same hight of the church. There are some more spots below the church and another one some meters above (but not at this day because of snow). I have taken several other pictures with more landscape visible but then the church is only a small part of the picture. I will upload them shortly. Maybe you like them better! ;-)

--Simonizer (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Awkward composition, Mediocre sharpness at full size, snow is under exposed. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:46, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose composition doesn't 'do it' for me --ianaré (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Weak support Per Notyourbroom. —kallerna™ 16:07, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, very interesting. --Aqwis (talk) 16:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good picture. --Korman (talk) 05:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Llorenzi (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. I think the unbalanced composition works here, as it adds to precarious feeling.Jonathunder (talk) 18:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

result: 10 support, 2 oppose => featured --Simonizer (talk) 21:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)