Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mist - Ensay region2.jpg

Image:Mist - Ensay region2.jpg Vote on alternative - not featured

•  Info created by, uploaded by, nominated by --Benjamint444 10:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Benjamint444 10:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose 299 KB ? You are joking, arent you? --Simonizer 11:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose The file size is way too low, introducing all manner of jpeg artifacts and blotchiness. -- Ram-Man 11:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose as above, though I would like to see a high quality version. What did you use for stitching? --Digon3 13:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment A great image, but let's see it not so compressed (remember JPG is a lossy format and looses info the more you compress), I would have expected a reasonable compression (eg 95% quality setting) of an image of those dimensions to result in a file size in the range 1.5MB to 2MB --Tony Wills 13:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

• I concur. The issue here is the jpeg quality setting, not the image itself. -- Ram-Man 13:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
• This is a great picture! But I would agree on the poor compression. --Christoph Michels 15:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

•  Neutral Great image ! Would support if the image would be replaced by a higher quality image (less compression). The jpeg artficacts are really visible in full-size resolution. --Atoma 20:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment W-O-W ! please provide us with a better quality image :) Benh 23:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
• Sorry, I don't know how that happened because I just a have a load of photoshop actions that downsample and save for web so the compression should be exactly the same as all my other images.
• close this nom, please vote below on alternative --Benjamint444 08:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

 Withdrawn by nominator - not featured - Alvesgaspar 10:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mist - Ensay region3.jpg (less compression), featured

•  Info created by, uploaded by, nominated by --Benjamint444 10:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Benjamint444 10:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
• This one is saved with minimum compression as per comments above.--Benjamint444 08:27, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Can't see any stitching errors, great light, great shot :-) --Tony Wills 08:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support  Support (Hope this will count as a double support ;)) A great panorama, and one of my favorites so far on Wikipedias and Commons. The colour tones which I find inadequate on your animal pictures here fits remarkably well and in addition to the fog/cloud/mist gives this image a wonderful atmosphere. I'm really missing words to tell how I feel. Now I just wish I could take a similar picture... Congratulations !!! Benh 11:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Digon3 12:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --Thermos 12:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Winiar^✉ 13:22, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support It's really quite good. I wish there was more vertical resolution, but what can you do? -- Ram-Man 14:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support – totally great!! — H92 (t · c · no) 14:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 15:09, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Romary 16:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support wow ! --Bergwolf 19:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nice indeed. --Javier ME 23:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Tbc 23:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Thisisbossi 02:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Atoma 20:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Simonizer 07:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support - Alvesgaspar 09:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Woah! Lovely image, great job! Majorly (hot!) 18:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent! --Karelj 20:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Leafnode 08:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- Lycaon 06:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR 19:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support perfect. --Diligent 00:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Strong support --Makro Freak 23:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --LucaG 14:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 06:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)