Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bayerisches Nationalmuseum Munich, April 2018.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bayerisches Nationalmuseum Munich, April 2018.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 May 2018 at 22:56:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
Info The Bavarian National Museum in Munich is one of the most important museums of decorative arts in Europe and one of the largest art museums in Germany. All by me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:27, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Oppose --Fentriss (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC) (we have got the year 2018. Resolution is not enough. The pixels are not clean - shadowconflict, the street is in action like a chaos, The lightning could be more accurate - play with overexposing - show us a little bit more architecture of the building - wait for a fullmoon with little clouds - no wind - the clouds are moving - blurry, the wood on the left side fits not to the composing - waiting for wintertime here - pre-spring period, the whole scene needs more time - the person should not be there - the bikecycle - give the street a momentum of pause... wait for red traffic lights - the street will be empty.)
- Well... okay... the resolution’s due to the fact that I had to crop the image (taken with my uwa lense kept perpendicular); the light trails are a feature, not a bug; the lighting is accurate; of course the clouds are moving, it’s a long exposure, and there’s always traffic on Prinzregentenstraße; but thanks anyway for disliking my image that much that you even felt compelled to post your first (?) contribution here. Normally I’m not bothered by negative votes. At all. Really. Here I’m honestly a bit flappergasted... sorry. —Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Bitte nicht falsch verstehen. Aber ich habe vor dem Bauwerk schon Stunden verbracht, auf die Passanten, Fahrzeuge, auf eine schlichtere Dekoration vor der Fassade gewartet, und mir erschien bisher kein Zeitpunkt so richtig gut genug. Und auch hier, es ist noch nicht ausgereift. Die Fassade des Gebäudes selbst ist auch so unruhig, die Pixel der images sahen immer so "kaputt" aus, ich war nie zufrieden, somit konnte ich hier auch kein pro vergeben. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss (talk) 10:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- alles gut! :-) Stimmt schon, es ist recht knifflig dort —Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:11, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Bitte nicht falsch verstehen. Aber ich habe vor dem Bauwerk schon Stunden verbracht, auf die Passanten, Fahrzeuge, auf eine schlichtere Dekoration vor der Fassade gewartet, und mir erschien bisher kein Zeitpunkt so richtig gut genug. Und auch hier, es ist noch nicht ausgereift. Die Fassade des Gebäudes selbst ist auch so unruhig, die Pixel der images sahen immer so "kaputt" aus, ich war nie zufrieden, somit konnte ich hier auch kein pro vergeben. Grüsse,richard --Fentriss (talk) 10:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Well... okay... the resolution’s due to the fact that I had to crop the image (taken with my uwa lense kept perpendicular); the light trails are a feature, not a bug; the lighting is accurate; of course the clouds are moving, it’s a long exposure, and there’s always traffic on Prinzregentenstraße; but thanks anyway for disliking my image that much that you even felt compelled to post your first (?) contribution here. Normally I’m not bothered by negative votes. At all. Really. Here I’m honestly a bit flappergasted... sorry. —Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I too find the moving light trails a distraction here. Charles (talk) 11:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support For Blue hour quite good --A.Savin 12:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like so much about this, but that light trail swooshing across the signs at the bottom keeps this from FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Neptuul (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 14:30, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Info a very last minute attempt to address the issues mentioned above: Applying segments of a different frame taken a few moments earlier (and relying on my limited photoshop proficiency), I've both removed the sitting cyclist on the right and the annoying "swooshing" in the middle. Pinging Daniel Case, Ikan Kekek, Johann Jaritz, Ermell, Fentriss, Charles, A.Savin, Neptuul, MZaplotnik, Ralf Roleček --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Comment still there across the billboards. Charles (talk) 13:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm undecided on FP, but this is a lot better and I've struck my oppose vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany
