Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grand canyon of Yellowstone and Yellowstone fall.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Grand canyon of Yellowstone and Yellowstone fall.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2009 at 20:36:06
Grand Canyon of Yellowstone and Yellowstone fall

No, this image was never voted before. I uploaded a new version few days ago--Mbz1 (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My Metadata was lost in one of my PS edits, but here's the original File:Yellowstone canyon not post processed image.jpg. I do not think that with F11 we could talk about "Lack of depth of field". Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you may be right… though I would have preferred if DoP was a bit more pronounced, using a f/6.3 aperture for example. Apart from this, which is a personal taste, I think the photo is really good. Diti the penguin 08:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The colors look too saturated and the contrast seem a bit high. /Daniel78 (talk) 23:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Great shot of the waterfall, and you can see the flow of water, when zoomed in to look at details. But there are a couple of places which look like saturated white, and something about the canyon sides wipes out the DOF. Perhaps a couple of hours earlier or later in the day would put shadows in the right places. Otherwise, I like it and may support when I've had a night's sleep. -- Robert of Ramsor (talk) 00:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit 1, not featured[edit]

Grand Canyon of Yellowstone and Yellowstone fall

result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original (not post processed)[edit]

Grand Canyon of Yellowstone and Yellowstone fall

It is a good image IMO. Please feel free to play with colors, everybody. Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Ö 11:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]