Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hemerocallis Lilioasphodelus.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Hemerocallis Lilioasphodelus.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2012 at 18:56:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Paolo Costa (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Paolo Costa (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 15:35, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Katarighe (Talk · Contributions · E-mail) 19:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support not bad.Trongphu (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry Paolo, but although the colours are very nice, I don't think it's amongst the best flower shot we have over here. It's not tack sharp and the background is too distracting. Little wow overall. - Benh (talk) 11:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- I thought it would be worth the try comparing to other Hemerocallis pictures, no problem. --Paolo Costa (talk) 18:51, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose As per Benh. --WikedKentaur (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support I cultivate Hemerocallis and also Hemerocallis Lilioasphodelus for decades. Therefore I can say: this image is very good. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Benh. ■ MMXX talk 23:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- Neutral - it's a nice photograph of the species, and perhaps our best, but I tend to agree with Benh about the technical quality. --Claritas (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support Nice picture. –ElmA (Talk – My files – E-mail) 18:34, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose as Benh --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:31, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- I actually really think this image has potential. I wouldn't be surprised if it became an FP. TrebleSeven (talk) 16:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)