Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Las labradas petroglyphs 1.jpg

File:Las labradas petroglyphs 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2009 at 22:57:07

•  Info created,uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:57, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very nice composition, quality is good --ianaré (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Umnik (talk) 14:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Of course. --Mbz1 (talk) 20:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Support This one of the pictures that I love, simply because it surprised me. I couldn't work out why it had been nominated, until I looked at the full version, and spotted the glyphs. Well done. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 02:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose too dark. --Karel (talk) 09:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment Too dark? Well, if the rocks are dark, how else would they show if not in their darkness? If a person´s skin is dark, must it be lightened up? What is too dark? Please explain in photographic terms. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Just not enought wow IMO. Sorry. —kallerna™ 13:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Kellerna. I mean, anyone could have shown up at the right time of day and taken this photo. It's pretty and interesting but that's not enough. Downtowngal (talk) 18:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment LOL!!!! Yes, anyone could have... but nobody did!!! This is not really supposed to be a pretty picture, but a picture of petroglyphs, on the beach, a very specific place on earth, made interesting by the fact that despite the hundreds of years, erosion, the glyphs survive, and they themselves represent interesting graphics and patterns. The intention is to show the glyphs, in and in relation to their environment. If on top of that you want to discuss photographic technique... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Tomas, I like your work, I like your artistic sensibility, but I am not judging by my taste, I'm judging by the FP criteria, like a juror on a jury who has to abide by the law, and one of the requirements is to explain opposition. I can just oppose without explanation too. Downtowngal (talk) 02:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

 Comment LOL!!! Downtowngirl, don´t take it personal... I just like to argue a bit... It´s a long story here... ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose It's a matter of personnal taste, but I would have prefered a composition where the proportion of the drawings would have been bigger. --S23678 (talk) 03:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Maedin\talk 11:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)