Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Natural del Cañón del Río Lobos, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 21-27 PAN.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Parque Natural del Cañón del Río Lobos, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 21-27 PAN.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2018 at 08:23:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info Canyon of the Lobos River Natural Park seen from La Galiana viewpoint, province of Soria, Castile and León, Spain. The Lobos River is the axle of the homonymous canyon and originator of the erosion that formed the vertical limestone walls of more than 100 metres (330 ft) height. The park has a total surface of 10,176 hectares (25,150 acres) 2/3 of it, but the source of the river (located in the province of Burgos), is located in the province of Soria. Poco2 08:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco2 08:23, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment There are crop errors in two places on the top of the image. Knowing Poco he'll probably fix that soon enough, so I'll hold off the oppose, but come on, Poco - you're a pro, you shouldn't let amateur mistakes like these slip by you. ;-P --Peulle (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)--Peulle (talk) 11:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed, that was sloppy, Peulle, sorry, I fixed it. --Poco2 14:20, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 23:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Something I often stumble on with panoramic pictures: I would love to see a bit more on the top and bottom, in this case the road in front is cut off in the center. Having the full road in the image would provide a better feel of depth. C-M (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- C-M: like here? that's a pano of verticals frames, but there are always reasons not to support it. When I stand there looking at a landscape like this I was moved by the infinity and by the curved shape of the canyon. The road you talk about lacks IMHO of importance here because it is not the road that crosses the canyon but just an auxiliary paved road to access there, nothing wild IMHO. Offering more on the bottom would result in comments like "unteresting foreground". I've around for a while already. Poco2 22:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Confirmed results: