Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Uniform of Mining Institute.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Uniform of Mining Institute.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2018 at 16:38:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Uniform of Mining Institute, late 18th - mid 19th century
Unfortunately, there is no SVG version. — Niklitov (talk) 16:48, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. New copyright - Creative Commons (CC). — Niklitov (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter what license the photo is under, author's signatures are a no-no on FPCs. Please read the guidelines: "3. No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." --Cart (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I try CropTool, but: "the overwrite option is disabled because the image has passed an assessment process". — Niklitov (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The rules are the same for QI as for FP, so this is yet another example of when the QI assessment doesn't work and there should be some sort of mechanism for re-evaluating a QI. I'll give the cropping a try. --Cart (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed Signature removed. --Cart (talk) 19:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There really should be a way to nominate QIs for removal of QI status, but when I suggested it, I don't think a single other user agreed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: It's interesting you should say that, because I think there is a bit of an opening in certain cases. Firstly, the guidelines are all about quality and time of creation: "...at the moment of creation, a Commons user skillfully achieved a desirable level of quality, a recognition that is not erased by later advances. [...] there is no formal mechanism for delisting quality images." The point is that once the quality of the image has been judged good enough for its moment of creation, it cannot be revoked. I think this is a good thing; discussion should happen around the nomination, not long after. It would cause too many practical problems. However, we are talking about judging the quality here. When it comes to obvious disqualifiers, the guideline is different: "If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected." In other words, the quality is judged once and only once. If an image should never have been promoted for other reasons than quality, however, such as not being eligible, it can be delisted. I see the signature issue as connected - it is not related to the judgment of quality but to the eligibility of the image in the first place.--Peulle (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's a good point. However, I do think that if a file has been erroneously given a QI designation, that should be revokable for reasons of quality. But there's overwhelming disagreement with that idea, and we certainly aren't going to change that here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - I like this, but it isn't very user-friendly, because in order to see the larger sizes of uniforms, I have to scroll down to see the bottom. Is there a way this PNGs could be designed so that the blowups you can see when you mouse over each one appear within the boundaries of the screen and are automatically limited to the size of your screen? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done — Niklitov (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No. Now, the uniforms when I mouse over are much smaller than they otherwise appear on the page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed 130px. Ok? — Niklitov (talk) 09:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No. It's still smaller when I mouse over it than when I look at the image on the page. Do you understand what I'm asking for? I want the blowup when I mouse over each image to extend from the bottom of my screen to the top, the entire way, but only that far. Am I asking for something impossible? If it's not possible, please revert to the previous version, when I had to scroll down to see the whole of the blowup but at least it was actually bigger than the file appears on the page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Returned. I do not know how to do better... — Niklitov (talk) 09:51, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment These are issues for the Wikimedia Commons interface. Have specific image questions? – Niklitov (talk) 08:11, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Uniform_of_Mining_Institute.png&oldid=326681644"