Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Busola.JPG

File:2016 Busola.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2016 at 22:11:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Busola.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Busola.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
•  Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  weak support very bright areas but ok IMHO --Ezarateesteban 22:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose - I find this too glary to want to support for a feature. With an object like this, I think the picture should be pretty near perfect for us to feature it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Ikan Kekek: What computer/screen do you use, some reset my help. Laptop helpless. --Mile (talk) 07:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks for offering to help, but no thanks. I have a pretty good laptop screen that has a much bigger picture than smart phones, which are what I think most people are using to look at Commons, nowadays. It's a Lenovo 20dccto1ww. Will you offer to give INeverCry reset advice, too? I've started to feel like when I find fault with a photo, some people are trying to insinuate there's something wrong with my screen or display, because they're aware now that I use a laptop, rather than whatever it is they think I should spend extra money on (another laptop, someone suggested), which is NOT happening. But anyway, thanks again for your friendly offer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
      • Also, I'll stipulate that this is a good photo, maybe even very good, but I don't find it super-great and I'm not wowed by it. I mean no disrespect at all to Jacek in opposing a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
• Yes, laptop. You know i never use laptop to edit/grade photo, far from real. I dont see any glare, thats the point. So togehter with INeverCry if using laptop, do it at night, no lights, might be helpfull - no reflections. I dont belive poelpe are using their smartphones for grading Commons, using AMOLED would be big mistake. --Mile (talk) 08:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

• What do you think most people are using to view the photographs on this side (not to judge them at FPC)? Photographs need to look great on good laptop screens, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Ikan. INeverCry 03:28, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

• I use a 21 inch monitor on an HP PC, often with a high contrast black and green theme in the evenings. In this photograph, the light is quite uneven; the right side of the cover has glare, and there's also a bit of glare on the rim of the compass body near where the pointer indicates South. I wouldn't demand completely even lighting in a shot like this, but it should be more even and flattering to the object than this, as it is in File:Binocular compound microscope, Carl Zeiss Jena, 1914 (6779276516).jpg, which was promoted to FP not long ago. INeverCry 17:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support I'm using an HP laptop at the moment and I'm OK with it. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)