Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:25 P 51XR Mustang N6WJ Precious Metal Reno Air Race 2014 photo D Ramey Logan.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:25 P 51XR Mustang N6WJ Precious Metal Reno Air Race 2014 photo D Ramey Logan.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2015 at 13:10:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info created by D Ramey Logan - uploaded by WPPilot - nominated by WPPilot -- WPPilot (talk) 13:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Support -- WPPilot (talk) 13:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Great view, but, sorry, also lacks sharpness. --Tremonist (talk) 13:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Comment This plane is traveling at about 500 mph.. --WPPilot (talk) 14:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- 500mph? Maybe kph. You can assure sharpness by using higher ISO and shutter speed like 1/2500 or 1/4000. Anyway, for planes and helicopters with propellers, it's better to use slower shutter speeds, like 1/400, so that the movement of the blades is better shown, and therefore you have to use something more similar to a panning technique. I also Oppose because of oversaturation. The blue sky is nice, but it could be much better to have a couple of clouds for a FP. --Kadellar (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- 500mph? Maybe kph. You can assure sharpness by using higher ISO and shutter speed like 1/2500 or 1/4000. Anyway, for planes and helicopters with propellers, it's better to use slower shutter speeds, like 1/400, so that the movement of the blades is better shown, and therefore you have to use something more similar to a panning technique. I also
- Support - excellent shot considering that the plane is at quite a distance and moving quickly; the colours look good, especially the resemblance to the Swedish flag (as apparently the pilot is a Swede); meets the other general requirements (license, 2+Mpx). Green Giant (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose as oversaturated Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Daniel rule --LivioAndronico talk 19:49, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose As others. With better sharpness it could have been something. Now I doubt it could be QP. -- Pofka (talk) 18:55, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
