Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bamberg Bug Regnitz Kormoran 121712.jpg

File:Bamberg Bug Regnitz Kormoran 121712.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2019 at 20:57:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bamberg Bug Regnitz Kormoran 121712.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bamberg Bug Regnitz Kormoran 121712.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
•  Info all by Ermell -- Ermell (talk) 20:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not as good as two exisitng FPs File:Phalacrocorax carbo Vic.jpg and File:Phalacrocorax carbo SH 0541.jpg. Charles (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Very good: Excellent composition, beautiful colors, good sharpness. That there are other good images of birds like this has nothing to do with the quality of this one. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment That's not what the guidelines say: "our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others". And how can an image be one of "the finest on Commons" if there are two very similar images of the same species that are better photos - in terms of composition and technical quality? Charles (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - There could certainly be 3 FPs of this species, but I agree with you that the other two photos have better compositions. The things floating in the water and the unsharp branch in the immediate foreground detract somewhat from this good picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose I defer to Charles.--Peulle (talk) 06:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The frame is too large around the animal (top and sides). Blurry branch at the bottom and distracting elements in the water -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 17:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would have supported if this were a species we didn't have an FP for but I'm not really sure it can be called one of the best images on Commons when there are two better FPs already. Cmao20 (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above. --BoothSift 06:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2019 (UTC)