Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral da Sé em São Paulo.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Catedral da Sé em São Paulo.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2016 at 18:10:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created and uploaded by The Photographer - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:10, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Looks squashed. See this image for comparison. Firebrace (talk) 19:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
weak support I understand the difficulties here, but at the same time. The combination of wide angle., trees and perspective correction is a little problematic.--ArildV (talk) 22:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Support Per Arild. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Oppose wrong time of the day to take this shot, a lot of dark shadows on the main subject, the colour is not quite correct, stretched out in post to fix the tilt, not worked, even people are weird, this should not be even a QI, poor poor quality image. -- RTA 07:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per others: sub-optimal lighting and I'm pretty sure that that rose window over the portal is not oval in reality. --El Grafo (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Support INeverCry 22:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 23:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Temporary {{o}} when applying the vertical perspective correction you have to compensate the horizontal loss. Therefore it looks so squashed and the people underweighted.--Hubertl 08:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Support.-- Geagea (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Information to @Firebrace and Hubertl: Aspect ratio distortion fixed by Poco a poco. Thanks! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Support much better now. --Hubertl 16:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Support Thanks Poco a poco --The Photographer (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings