Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2011 at 21:02:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Church of the virgin of the burgh Rhodes 14th century night.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of the virgin of the burgh Rhodes 14th century night.jpg
Info. By night, the ruins of the choir of the church of the Virgin of the Burgh, 14th century, in the medieval city of Rhodes, island of Rhodes, Greece. All by me -- Jebulon (talk) 21:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a useful review, sorry. I don't understand what is meant by "type of shots". Illuminated buildings night shots ? We have tons of "by day" pictures too :)... We have tons of Eiffel tower images, Big Ben, Invalides, Washington Capitole, bugs, critters, flowers, shells or chemical elements and so on, we continue to feature some, and I'm happy with that. This one is unique in "Commons", even if we have some pictures of the same ruins by day. Thank you for the "technically nice".--Jebulon (talk) 08:43, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral (with leaning to oppose). I think you've made the best out of the situation. But IMO were you there too late. It's so much black on the image and the spires of this building that aren't illuminated are really underexposed. Some minutes/hours earlier, during the blue hour and/or a HDR image would make it really better. Sorry. --kaʁstnDisk/Cat10:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The same, by day
Comment No need to be sorry, your review is very interesting and useful. My attempt here is not to be misunderstood : I especially attempted to shoot a night picture. Not a "blue hour" one, but really a "night" one. And night is dark and black, and "black" does not mean "underexposed" (by the way, pure white does not mean neither "overexposed"). And the "black" is not absolute here: one may see stars, it is not a mask. Well, I think these ruins (they are only remains of the gothic choir, nothing else) are interesting to be seen by night, and the lighting, from below in the ground, is very nice and not disturbing. This is rare, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 15:36, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it looks too dark to be featurable, or it seems too dark, or some can feel it is too dark. But it is not too dark to be featurable. Such categorical judgments sounds not well-balanced enough to be useful... Welcome back ;)--Jebulon (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It looks as if it seems that's the way you feel, but actually it is the reality. That feels rather balanced to me. Thanks for the personal touch. And oh... ... did I go somewhere ?? ;-). W.S.13:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Bad review ( which isn't surprising given bla bla bla -no personal attack-). It is really ISO 200. Why not ? I'm not fool enough to change the metadata on the file description page. Furthermore I don't know how to do. Welcome back to the other duettist.--Jebulon (talk) 20:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bad faith and doesn't seem to take criticism well. I'm surprised it's ISO 200 because of the the noise, and apparent NR artifacts. who uses f/20 for a night shot but you ? - Benh (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info. By night, the ruins of the choir of the church of the Virgin of the Burgh, 14th century, in the medieval city of Rhodes, island of Rhodes, Greece. All by me -- Jebulon (talk) 21:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Jebulon (talk) 21:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Neutral We have tons of these types of shots, but technically it's nice. theMONO 04:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Comment No need to be sorry, your review is very interesting and useful. My attempt here is not to be misunderstood : I especially attempted to shoot a night picture. Not a "blue hour" one, but really a "night" one. And night is dark and black, and "black" does not mean "underexposed" (by the way, pure white does not mean neither "overexposed"). And the "black" is not absolute here: one may see stars, it is not a mask. Well, I think these ruins (they are only remains of the gothic choir, nothing else) are interesting to be seen by night, and the lighting, from below in the ground, is very nice and not disturbing. This is rare, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 15:36, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose While appreciating it to be a night shot, it is too dark to be featurable. W.S. 11:54, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Weak support Quality could be higher. Can I support both the day and night shot together? If so then that's what I do. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 03:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
