Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 71-86 HDR PAN.jpg

File:Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 71-86 HDR PAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2019 at 21:10:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 71-86 HDR PAN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Desierto de Lut, Irán, 2016-09-22, DD 71-86 HDR PAN.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info Panoramic view during sunset of Dasht-e Lut, in English "Emptiness desert", located in the provinces of Kerman and Sistan-Baluchistan, Iran. This place is pretty special for being the spot on the Earth where the highest temperature was ever measured (70 °C or 159 °F) and since July 2016 a UNESCO World Heritage Site. Note: there is another FP of this location, sehe here. All by me, Poco² 21:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Great one - it's like an alien landscape. There is a pretty obvious stitching error though, which I've marked on the nomination page. Cmao20 (talk) 22:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- 🇪A〒ℂ🇭A  💬 06:39, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 06:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now. I will be happy to switch to support as soon as the stitching error is fixed. It is also a bit noisy, maybe this can also be improved. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:55, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support now --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose for the stitching error (why don't you guys check your FP nom panoramas more thoroughly for these and dust spots? ...) and the two cars on the extreme left which kind of spoil the “Emptiness desert” for me. Also there are visible halos from sharpening. – Lucas 11:03, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

   Comment Stitching issues will be fixed later today Poco² 13:13, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

  Uoaei1, Lucas:  New version uploaded. I've improved the perspective, removed the cars on the far left and fixed the stitching issues. I didn't "address" the sharpening because those are not sharpening halos, it does indeed look like that in the original RAW files, which fits the fact that I didn't sharpen any area of the image in addition to my standard overall sharpening. --Poco² 19:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

  You didn't fix the stitching error fully (there are two separate notes). BTW, the far mountaintops are sharp on the right and become blurry on the left with a sharp transition inbetween; see new note. – Lucas 20:54, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

  Lucas, better now? Poco² 21:44, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

  Yes, but my last remark still stands (blurry mountaintops). I found another stitching error but it's too small to be able to place a note on it. – Lucas 07:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

  Ok, Lucas, my last attempt is uploaded: mountains in the back are sharper, stitching issue fixed (hopefully the same you saw), dust spots gone Poco² 20:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

   Support, but please take your time looking for these issues next time before nominating ;). It felt like one of Moroder’s Hasselblad panoramas with small errors that all needed to be pointed out to get fixed. – Lucas 07:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

  You're of course right, Lucas, I'll invest more time in reviewing images before I nominate them to FP. Thank you for your patience! --Poco² 17:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Regardless. --BoothSift 01:26, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 17:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--BoothSift 05:43, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural