Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Estanque Chinesco, Jardín del Príncipe, Aranjuez, Madrid.jpg

File:Estanque Chinesco, Jardín del Príncipe, Aranjuez, Madrid.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2020 at 17:18:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Estanque Chinesco, Jardín del Príncipe, Aranjuez, Madrid.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Estanque Chinesco, Jardín del Príncipe, Aranjuez, Madrid.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Spain
•  Info created by Javier Montes - uploaded by Javierm18 - nominated by Javierm18 -- Javierm18 (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Javierm18 (talk) 17:18, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor lighting, most of the subject is not well-lit. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

  Javierm18: it's always motivating for us to see new users submitting images for FPC but this image is indeed far from FP. Apart from the issues KoH mentioned, the image is tilted and the level of detail is poor although your equipment is very good. You applied an extremely high shutter speed (1/2000s) for a static subject, where 1/50s would have been enough (if you would have liked to go for a more artistic shot, you could have used 2s to get a smooth water effect using a ND filter). The high shutter speed forced you to use a high ISO (1100) that you had to compensate later on with strong denoising. The result is that the detail is gone, and just due to wrong camera settings. Before you nominate images here, I recommend you to do that here. Poco a poco (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose per Poco, although the detail at full res is not that bad IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not super-great as needed for FP. However, you should take some of the critiques from here, edit the file and try submitting it to COM:QIC. It's a large file and might pass there if you do a little bit of work on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:35, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Poco. A shame ... this view has promise. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:53, 16 October 2020 (UTC)