Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds 1.jpg

File:Farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2018 at 22:01:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds 1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#United_States
• Abandoned farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds, Virgnia Beach, VA. All by me. -- PumpkinSky talk 22:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- PumpkinSky talk 22:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose An excellent perspective, but unfortunately no wow for me. --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 22:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Captivating symmetrical building -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per Basile. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I always have to remind me what the german description about the featured pictures says. These are "exzellente Bilder" and I can't see any excellence in this technically well done image. --Granada (talk) 07:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Granada: That's because you only see excellence in your own photos. But thanks for at least seeing the technical merits. PumpkinSky talk 13:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Granada: And as proof of that I submit that the only FPCs you've ever supported were your own, never anyone else's. PumpkinSky talk 13:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I can understand why someone might not find this image extraordinary, but it's excellent to me. I don't think the subject has to be obviously flashy for the work to be excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Ikan Kekek: Thank you. I have always agreed with that. What you just called "flashy" is the self-imposed "wow requirement". PumpkinSky talk 13:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting object but photographed without wow effect. The shadows bother more than they enrich the image. Strangely enough, the perspective has also not been corrected, which usually leads to rejection in QI.--Ermell (talk) 08:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ermell.--Peulle (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't think the perspective is a problem. This was taken on my tripod with the legs spread wide apart so it'd take the photo at an up angle. PumpkinSky talk 13:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination PumpkinSky talk 21:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--PumpkinSky talk 21:22, 29 December 2017 (UTC)