User talk:Michielverbeek

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predel, kerk IMG 3545 2022-08-14 10.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gera, Salvatorkirche Dm IMG 3480 2022-08-13 10.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanna-Unterkoskau, dorpszicht in de verte IMG 3343 2022-08-11 11.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanna-Unterkoskau, Friedenskirche Dm IMG 3357 2022-08-11 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziegenrück, boven op de berg - Kemenate Orlamünde (overblijfsel van de Burganlage) Dm en langs de rivier hotel Am Schlossberg IMG 3361 2022-08-11 14.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keila, Dorfkirche Dm IMG 3410 2022-08-12 10.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustadt an der Orla-Linda, Dorfkirche IMG 3442 2022-08-12 12.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziegenrück, Hotel Am Schlossberg IMG 3407 2022-08-11 18.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:09, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustadt an der Orla-Köthnitz, Kirche IMG 3457 2022-08-12 12.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elsteraue-Draschwitz, lagere school Dm094 85726 IMG 3524 2022-08-13 17.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chemnitz, straatzicht Annabergstrasse bij de Zaungasse met Dm09202288 IMG 2632 2022-07-31 13.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thum, bushalte Markt IMG 2648 2022-07-31 15.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlettau, zicht op de stad IMG 2662 2022-08-01 10.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dull light, but good quality. --Milseburg 08:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weil am Rhein-Märkt, stuw Stauwehr am Altrhein - Barrage EDF de Kembs IMG 1367 2022-05-14 09.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly tilted clockwise. --C messier 20:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done New version uploaded with small perspective correction. Thanks for review and patience --Michielverbeek 07:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK. --C messier 19:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elstertrebnitz, Kreuzkirche Dm09258478 IMG 3548 2022-08-14 10.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pegau-Wiederau, Sankt-Johannis-Kirche Dm09257916 IMG 3564 2022-08-14 11.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwenkau-Zitschen, kerk Dm09256651 IMG 3579 2022-08-14 12.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rochlitz, Marktbrunnen Dm09235308 met twee andere monumenten Dm09235310+11 op de achtergrond IMG 2614 2022-07-31 09.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Burgstein-Pirk, viadukt snelweg 72 bij autoweg 173 IMG 3312 2022-08-11 09.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weischlitz-Toschen, ingang naar het dorp IMG 3327 2022-08-11 10.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support  Support Good quality. --Valo139 15:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Seelitz-Beedeln, panorama IMG 2618 2022-07-31 10.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Valo139 19:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waarschijnlijk Burkhardtsdorf-Eibenberg en Neu-Eibenberg, panorama IMG 2636 2022-07-31 14.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strong tilt cw. --Milseburg 08:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for review, new version uploaded and I hope it is repaired now correctly --Michielverbeek 09:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC) Tilt is fixed. A bit soft regarding the low resolution, but good enough for QI I think. --Milseburg 17:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Michielverbeek,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Brambach, Michaeliskirche Dm08980076 IMG 3305 2022-08-10 12.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilts very slightly to the left --Valo139 15:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for review, I have ✓ Done a small perspective correction --Michielverbeek 22:23, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Valo139 11:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mittelpöllnitz, Kirche Dm IMG 3475 2022-08-12 13.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please do a correction of the verticals, right side is leaning in --Uoaei1 06:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I cannot see the verticals are not straight --Michielverbeek 18:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustadt an der Orla-Dreba, Dorfkirche IMG 3426 2022-08-12 11.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

[[File:|75px|center]]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! [[:File:|]], which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, toren van de Aa-kerk RM18423 IMG 4225 2023-04-02 15.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI assuming the tilt is for real --Poco a poco 18:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, toren van de Aa-kerk vanaf de Visserbrug IMG 4256 2023-04-02 18.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, binnenvaartschepen op de Hoge der Aa IMG 4173 2023-04-02 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, binnenvaartschip Stroom op de Hooge der Aa IMG 4177 2023-04-02 14.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, binnenvaartschip de KW37 in de Noorderhaven IMG 4202 2023-04-02 14.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 21:59, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehl, silogebouw bij het treinstation GM0222-WN124 IMG 4337 2023-04-03 14.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehl, toren van de Sint-Martinuskerk RM38665 IMG 4344 2023-04-03 14.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, Groninger Museum vanaf de westkant IMG 4247 2023-04-02 18.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, Groninger Museum vanaf de westkant IMG 4310 2023-04-02 20.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 13:35, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, Het Peerd van Ome Loeks (kunstenaar Jan de Baat) IMG 4156 2023-04-02 13.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Overexposed. --多多123 18:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)  Question Whole photo, or only the horse? --Michielverbeek 20:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)  Comment I did not get an answer to my question so I have reduced brightness of the main object (horse) --Michielverbeek 19:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --多多123 19:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leudal-Horn, kasteel Horn IMG 4365 2023-04-09 09.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 21:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nederweert-Leveroy, de Sint-Barbarakerk IMG 4387 2023-04-09 10.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, though borderline sharpness --Tagooty 01:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, binnenvaartschip de KW37 in de Noorderhaven IMG 4186 2023-04-02 14.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The house on the left is leaning out and obviously shows a barrel deformation. Please correct. --Palauenc05 07:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, you were right ✓ Done. Please look to new version --Michielverbeek 19:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Better now --Palauenc05 17:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waalre, de Sint-Willibrorduskerk RM513711 2023-04-09 16.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meierijstad-Nijnsel, de Parochiekerk RM520467 IMG 4602 2023-04-17 16.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meierijstad-Nijnsel, de Parochiekerk RM520467 en Heilig Hartbeeld RM520468 IMG 4609 2023-04-17 16.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:06, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wijchen-Alverna, windmolen Schoonoord RM39639 IMG 4517 2023-04-17 11.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maashorst-Zeeland, de Coppensmolen RM40320 IMG 4532 2023-04-17 13.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Groningen en Haren, de Duinkerkenbrug IMG 6090 2023-05-28 10.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 06:12, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen-Haren, de Meerwegbrug IMG 6102 2023-05-28 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ooststellingwerf-Appelscha, ophaalbrug IMG 6146 2023-05-28 15.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Midden Drenthe tussen Hoogersmilde en Hijkersmilde, de Spiersbrug IMG 6166 2023-05-28 17.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westerveld-Geeuwenbrug, de Geeuwenbrug IMG 6170 2023-05-28 17.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Noordenveld-Peize en Haren, natuurgebied de Onlanden IMG 6124 2023-05-28 12.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noordenveld-Peize, het voormalige gemeentehuis RM478025 IMG 6130 2023-05-28 12.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 07:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breda, Kasteel van Breda RM10235 IMG 6759 2023-06-11 09.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breda, toren van de Grote of Onze Lieve Vrouwekerk RM10305 IMG 6768 2023-06-11 09.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:21, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nederweert, de Sint-Lambertuskerk RM30315 IMG 4413 2023-04-09 11.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Blurry, signs are not legible. Sharpening may help? Cropping foreground will help focus attention on the subject. Wrong Category. --Tagooty 02:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for my category mistake. I did a bottom and left crop to improve the focus. However I did not do any sharpening because I don't see any blurry signs, btw-I have cropped one Grolsch sign at the left. Unfortunately the bank has been cut now. --Michielverbeek 17:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, thank you --Tagooty 10:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, Groninger Museum vanaf de westkant IMG 4271 2023-04-02 19.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, het stadhuis RM13650 IMG 6830 2023-06-11 13.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, standbeeld van Willem van Oranje IMG 6786 2023-06-11 11.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwijndrecht, watertoren RM514921 vanaf Dordrecht IMG 6807 2023-06-11 12.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, zicht op de Wijnhaven vanaf de Nieuwbrug RM14043 met links de toren van de Bonifatiuskerk RM13998 IMG 6822 2023-06-11 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Snowmanstudios 09:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterland-Monnickendam, ophaalbrug de Rietvinkbrug IMG 6951 2023-06-25 11.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:48, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterland-Katwoude, windmolen de Kathammer RM527682IMG 6952 2023-06-25 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Terragio67 04:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotterdam-Leuvehaven, zicht vanaf Maritiem Museum naar de Wijnhaven IMG 6860 2023-06-11 19.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leende, de Sint-Petrus'-Bandenkerk RM23986 IMG 4454 2023-04-09 15.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groningen, Groninger Museum vanaf de westkant IMG 4317 2023-04-02 20.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Sky is too noisy and category for the time of day is missing --MB-one 18:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Michielverbeek 06:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edam-Volendam Oosthuizen, de Grote of Sint-Nicolaaskerk RM40332 IMG 6999 2023-06-25 14.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 20:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alkmaar-Schermerhorn, de Hervormde kerk RM33108 met waterspiegeling IMG 7007 2023-06-25 15.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schagen, torens van Slothotel Schagen IMG 7027 2023-06-25 18.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction is overdone and too much black shadow --Poco a poco 09:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, perspective correction and shadow reducement --Michielverbeek 19:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I'd have cropped more shadow but fine --Poco a poco 21:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, de Groothoofdspoort RM13310 IMG 6818 2023-06-11 12.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective doesn't look quite right (see edge of white building on the right), sky is noisy - fixable? --Mike Peel 06:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC) Little job I guess --Michielverbeek 05:27, 27 July 2023 (UTC) I have ✓ Done done a small persperctive correction --Michielverbeek 21:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maastricht, Petrus-en Pauluskerk IMG 6178 2023-06-01 11.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Piediluco 07:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo-Tegelen, raadhuis GM0983-3167 IMG 7122 2023-07-10 16.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo, Limburgs Museum IMG 7134 2023-07-10 17.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terneuzen-Sas van Gent, de Maria Hemelvaartkerk RM509986 IMG 6700 2023-06-07 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 04:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terneuzen-Westdorpe, de Onze Lieve Vrouw Visitatiekerk GM-0715WN126 IMG 6711 2023-06-07 13.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terneuzen-Axel, het voormalige gemeentehuis GM-0715WN005 IMG 6734 2023-06-07 14.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dordrecht, zicht op de Grote Kerk RM13417 vanaf de Lange IJzeren Brug RM14041 IMG 6805 2023-06-11 12.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schaffhausen, de Obertorturm IMG 4642 2023-04-28 19.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Hemmental en Beggingen, panorama IMG 4645 2023-04-29 10.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 16:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kayl, l'église Saint-Pierre-aux-Liens Dm IMG 6077 2023-05-14 13.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg, straatzicht Rue de la Haute Montée IMG 5386 2023-05-07 10.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg, l'église Saint-Jean en Fraternité Monastique de Jéruzalem PA00085027 IMG 5399 2023-05-07 11.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg, toren van Les Ponts Couverts IMG 5407 2023-05-07 11.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 07:35, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg, toren van Les Ponts Couverts IMG 5432 2023-05-07 11.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg, standbeeld Albert Schweitzer IMG 5441 2023-05-07 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Category for the artist should be added --Ermell 06:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I know, but there is not any article on Wikipedia about her. I am a little scared to add a new category because I have never done this before and yes she is from Switzerland (the French speaking part). I have add a new category, but it really needs to be checked. --Michielverbeek 20:05, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. If it is wrong someone else will fix it. --Ermell 07:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg, schip in Bassin Vauban IMG 5443 2023-05-07 13.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volendam, voetbalstadion FC Volendam IMG 6973 2023-06-25 12.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit grainy, but ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 20:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volendam, filiaal van Albert Heijn aan de Zeestraat IMG 6979 2023-06-25 12.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit grainy, but ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 20:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edam, het Damplein met RM14297en 98 IMG 6991 2023-06-25 13.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit grainy, but ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs 20:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stutzheim, gemeentehuis IMG 5493 2023-05-08 12.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiwersheim, gemeentehuis IMG 5516 2023-05-08 13.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venlo, binnenvaartsschip in de Maas vanaf de spoorbrug IMG 7148 2023-07-10 17.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:37, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg, toren van Les Ponts Couverts IMG 5417 2023-05-07 11.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too dark for me. Can you work on that in the raw files (take a look on the histogram) --Tuxyso 07:35, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have made ✓ Done the photo a bit brighter. Please realize it was a dark day and the f-value is at maximum high for this camera and I will always try to avoid white skies --Michielverbeek 18:40, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO not the best quality at all (noise, detail quality), but barely OK for QI. --Tuxyso 19:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Elst, Park Lingezegen - bomenrij langs sloot aan de Kerkstraat IMG 7186 2023-07-20 07.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durstell, dorpszicht met de protestantse kerk IMG 5636 2023-05-09 13.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grosbliederstroff, l'église Saint-Innocent IMG 5665 2023-05-10 09.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:27, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Beggingen, wegpanorama IMG 4667 2023-04-29 11.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 11:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hettange Grande, l’église Saint-Étienne IMG 6044 2023-05-14 10.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:15, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Waldwisse, panorama van een koolzaadveld IMG 6017 2023-05-13 12.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Remeling, gemeentehuis en school IMG 6023 2023-05-13 12.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kerling-les-Sierck, l'église Saint-Jean-Baptiste IMG 6034 2023-05-13 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thionville, l'église paroissiale Saint-Maximin vanaf de brug over de Moezel IMG 6038 2023-05-13 17.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terneuzen-Axel, NH kerk GM-0715WN004 IMG 6724 2023-06-07 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Luda.slominska 19:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volmerange-les-Mines, gemeentehuis IMG 6059 2023-05-14 11.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --WikiEuropian 13:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volmerange-les-Mines, l'église Saint-Denis IMG 6067 2023-05-14 11.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riemst-Herderen, parochiekerk Sint-Jan de Doper oeg36897 IMG 6183 2023-06-01 12.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Аныл Озташ 01:00, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grosbliederstroff, sluis IMG 5682 2023-05-10 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Elst, Park Lingezegen - sloot naar Rijksweg Noord IMG 7171 2023-07-20 07.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 12:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andenne-Andenelle, l' église Saint-Pierre IMG 6289 2023-06-02 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andenne, Pont d'Andenne IMG 6296 2023-06-02 10.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Dark, but good quality for QI. --SHB2000 10:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont à Cells (tussen Viesville en Luttre), l'écluse de Viesville IMG 6328 2023-06-03 10.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seneffe-Manage, voormalige spoorbrug IMG 6353 2023-06-03 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houdeng-Aimeries, l'église Saint Jean Baptiste IMG 6357 2023-06-03 14.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons, de toren van de belfort 53053-CLT-0014-01 IMG 6374 2023-06-03 19.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Ghlin, brug bij Recotri over kanaal Nimy-Blaton-Peronnes IMG 6378 2023-06-04 10.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Bernissart-Blaton, pont piéton IMG 6389 2023-06-04 11.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dossenheim sur Zinsel, straatzicht met l'église simultanée Saint-Léonard IMG 5579 2023-05-09 10.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Pecq, Pont Maurice Leynen IMG 6483 2023-06-05 10.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pecq-Warcoing, Polypea (industriëel bedrijf voor de ontwikkeling van bio-plastic materialen) IMG 6501 2023-06-05 11.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Pecq-Warcoing en Dottignies, canal de l'Espierres IMG 6505 2023-06-05 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai, standbeeld Christine Delalaing Princesse Despinoy IMG 6468 2023-06-05 08.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huy, zicht vanaf le Pont du Chemin de Fer met le Fort de Huy 61031-CLT-0025-01, la collégiale Notre-Dame et Saint-Domitien oeg61031-CLT-0011-01 en de kerncentrale van Tihange IMG 6258 2023-06-01 20.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mackwiller, gemeentehuis IMG 5639 2023-05-09 14.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Michielverbeek,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 
Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huy-Ahin, voormalig schoolgebouw en l'église Saint-Julien IMG 6267 2023-06-02 09.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Elst, Park Lingezegen - de Rijkerswoerdse Plassen, de kleine plas IMG 7233 2023-07-26 07.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I like this one better than the other, it's framed well by the trees and isn't at an angle. --JPxG 05:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
*  Support Somewhat soft, but good enough regarding the resolution. --Smial 10:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estaimpuis l'église Saint-Barthélemy IMG 6528 2023-06-05 12.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouscron-Herseaux, l'église du Christ-Roi IMG 6536 2023-06-05 13.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouscron, l'église Saint-Barthélemy IMG 6543 2023-06-05 14.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Péruwelz-Calenelle, spoorbrug over het kanaal IMG 6404 2023-06-04 12.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:12, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huy, zicht vanaf Pont Roi Baudouin met la collégiale Notre-Dame et Saint-Domitien oeg61031-CLT-0011-01 en le Fort de Huy 61031-CLT-0025-01 IMG 6229 2023-06-01 18.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 08:12, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, het Belfort oeg59642 IMG 6559 2023-06-05 18.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Luda.slominska 21:18, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, de Broeitorens IMG 6603 2023-06-06 10.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, de Collegebrug over de Leie IMG 6610 2023-06-06 10.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:37, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harelbeke, de Sint-Salvatorkerk IMG 6625 2023-06-06 11.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deerlijk, de Sint-Columbakerk IMG 6630 2023-06-06 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, de schouwburg oeg60156 IMG 6578 2023-06-06 09.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality--Luda.slominska 09:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huy-Gives, l'église Saint Nom de Marie IMG 6281 2023-06-02 10.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:21, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deinze. parochiekerk Sint-Martinus en Sint-Antonius Abt IMG 6685 2023-06-06 14.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai, sculptuur bij de Cathédrale Notre-Dame IMG 6435 2023-06-04 16.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 06:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai, la Grand Place IMG 6461 2023-06-05 08.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai, Pont des Trous 57081-CLT-0220-01 IMG 6477 2023-06-05 09.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 04:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Bernissart-Blaton, ophaalbrug IMG 6393 2023-06-04 12.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit noisy, but ok. --Sebring12Hrs 09:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antoing-Peronnes, l'écluse Peronnes IMG 6413 2023-06-04 13.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 05:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai, de Belfort 57081-CLT-0034-01 IMG 6447 2023-06-04 17.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waregem-Nieuwenhove, de Heilge Margarethakerk en basisschool IMG 6644 2023-06-06 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, de toren van de Sint-Maartenskerk IMG 6575 2023-06-05 18.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA, noisy, fixable? --多多123 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand the criticism. The image is okay, good quality -- Spurzem 20:04, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kortrijk, sculptuur (de Golf van Olivier Strebelle) op het Schouwburgplein IMG 6589 2023-06-06 09.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA, fixable? --多多123 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CAs? Where? – Good quality -- Spurzem 20:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geisingen-Aulfingen, Kiche Sankt Nikolaus Dm IMG 4709 2023-04-29 15.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:48, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geisingen-Kirchen Hausen, Pfarrkirche Sankt Marien Dm IMG 4716 2023-04-29 15.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immendingen, Kirche Sankt Peter und Paul IMG 4736 2023-04-29 19.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tuttlingen, toren van Kirche Sankt Peter und Paul IMG 4768 2023-04-30 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:38, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aldingen, de Mauritiuskirche IMG 4828 2023-04-30 14.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immendingen, de Donau vanaf Kreuz am Wasserfall IMG 4751 2023-04-29 19.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Some noise but at acceptable level. --Plozessor 06:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aldingen, de Mauritiuskirche IMG 4822 2023-04-30 14.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jay.Jarosz 19:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Epfendorf, straatzicht langs spoorlijn IMG 4932 2023-05-02 11.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberndorf-Aistaig, de evangelische kerk IMG 4981 2023-05-02 12.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterjettingen, de Michaelskirche IMG 5048 2023-05-03 12.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberjettingen, de evangelische kerk IMG 5051 2023-05-03 12.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rietheim-Weilheim, de Silvester Kapelle IMG 4785 2023-04-30 12.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:26, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eutingen im Gäu, Kirche Sankt Stephanus IMG 5096 2023-05-03 16.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Horb am Neckar-Bildechingen en Eutingen im Gäu, koolzaadveld IMG 5107 2023-05-03 16.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horb am Neckar, stadszicht met Stiftskirche Dm IMG 5112 2023-05-03 17.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support At full resolution this lacks detail (too much NR), but at 5 MP it's really good. --Plozessor 06:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horb am Neckar, de Stiftskirche Dm vanaf de brug over de Neckar IMG 5119 2023-05-04 09.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horb am Neckar-Altheim, kerk met Rathaus IMG 5138 2023-05-04 11.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornstetten-Aach, de Andreaskirche IMG 5149 2023-05-04 12.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freudenstadt-Wittlensweiler, de Sankt Galluskirche IMG 5157 2023-05-04 13.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rottweil, sculptuur van een rotweiler voor het stadsmuseum IMG 4914 2023-05-01 18.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Bad Griesbach, rivier de Rench langs de Schwarzwalderstrasse IMG 5216 2023-05-05 11.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 11:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Peterstal, toren van de Kirche Sankt Peter und Paul IMG 5232 2023-05-05 12.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberkirch, toren van de Sankt Cyriak Kirche IMG 5302 2023-05-06 09.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarbrücken-Burbach, de Sankt Eligiuskirche Dm IMG 5720 2023-05-10 14.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Dreisbach en Mettlach, de Saarschleife IMG 5988 2023-05-13 10.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, brug over de Saar IMG 5880 2023-05-11 17.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, de Alter Turm Dm IMG 5918 2023-05-11 19.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, standbeeld van bisschop Liutwin IMG 5954 2023-05-12 09.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 05:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, Kirche Sankt Gangolf Dm IMG 6001 2023-05-13 10.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, Kirche Sankt Gangolf Dm IMG 6007 2023-05-13 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freudenstadt, 60 jarig verbondheid met Courbevoie IMG 5180 2023-05-04 15.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freudenstadt, stadhuis met fontein IMG 5179 2023-05-04 15.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 17:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kniebis, de evangelische kerk IMG 5195 2023-05-05 10.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:35, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberkirch-Nussbach, Kirche Sankt Sebastian IMG 5310 2023-05-06 10.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Appenweier-Nesselried, Wallfahrtskirche IMG 5319 2023-05-06 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durbach-Ebersweiler, Heilig Kreuz Kirche in straatzicht IMG 5334 2023-05-06 11.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park Lingezegen, de Rijkerswoerdse Plassen - de grote plas bij zonsopkomst IMG 8214 versie2 2023-09-06 07.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 11:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park Lingezegen, de Rijkerswoerdse Plassen - de grote plas bij zonsopkomst IMG 8219 2023-09-06 07.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park Lingezegen, sloot naar het oostzuidoosten bij zonsopkomst IMG 9845 2023-10-18 07.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks --Imehling 10:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The christmas tree still has these strange fringes. Sorry. --Ermell 11:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mettlach, Kirche Sankt Gangolf Dm IMG 6004 2023-05-13 10.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Not too sharp, and the right side of the church is blown out. Any chance to fix that in raw conversion? --Plozessor 06:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)✓ Done a bit darker and made the colour white less stronger --Michielverbeek 20:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 20:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Griesbach, dorpszicht van boven IMG 5200 2023-05-05 11.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 16:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Griesbach, de Antoniuskirche IMG 5212 2023-05-05 11.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lochem, Silo Art Tour Achterhoek IMG 7302 2023-08-20 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 14:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posbank, dood hout tussen de bomen IMG 7366 2023-08-21 11.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posbank, dood hout heide en bomen IMG 7376 2023-08-21 11.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:32, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posbank - heide, bomen en struiken IMG 7436 2023-08-21 12.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:20, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Groesbeek, boerderij aan de Zevenheuvelweg (bij Kamp) IMG 9828 2023-10-15 15.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saarlouis, rondvaartboot Queen Wilma IMG 5752 2023-05-11 09.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's underexposed, please fix. --Kallerna 06:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A bit more light ✓ Done --Michielverbeek 20:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kehl, de Sankt-Nepomukkirche en de Friedenskirche vanaf de Brücke der Zwei Ufer IMG 5475 2023-05-07 17.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lautenbach, Kirche Mariä Krönung IMG5250 2023-05-05 15.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 17:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good composition, accurate colours. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eindhoven, fietsenstalling 18 Septemberplein westingang IMG 9865 2023-11-04 17.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, maybe simplify the filename a bit. --Plozessor 17:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meppel-Nijeveen, stellingmolen de Sterrenberg RM30957 IMG 8464 2023-09-11 13.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weststellingwerf-Wolvega, windmolen de Windlust RM38880 IMG 8508 2023-09-11 16.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lochem, brasserie Floris in het stationsgebouw IMG 7290 2023-08-20 12.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lochem, kantoorgebouw van Thoma Post Makelaars IMG 7315 2023-08-20 13.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwartewaterland-Mastenbroek, de NHkerk RM20925+6 IMG 8432 2023-09-11 11.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staphorst-Rouveen, de kerk van Rouveen RM47070 IMG 8456 2023-09-11 12.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Posbank - heide, bomen en struiken IMG 7430 2023-08-21 12.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steenwijkerland-Steenwijk, de Grote of Sint-Clementskerk RM34576 IMG 8488 2023-09-11 15.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergen op Zoom, stadhuis RM9112 met Hotel de Draak RM9130 IMG 8288 2023-09-10 10.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergen op Zoom, Theater de Maagd RM9127 IMG 8296 2023-09-10 10.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woendrecht, de Sint-Jozefkerk IMG 8322 2023-09-10 11.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen-Zandvliet, de Sint Gertrudiskerk oeg10856 IMG 8354 2023-09-10 13.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 07:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antwerpen-Berendrecht, de Buitenmolen oeg10828 IMG 8375 2023-09-10 13.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stabroek, parochiekerk Sint-Catharina oeg14213 IMG 8390 2023-09-10 14.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 10:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmthout, de watertoren IMG 8404 2023-09-10 15.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willich-Schiefbahn, katholischen Pfarrkirche Sankt Hubert Dm18 IMG 7078 2023-07-10 11.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:21, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Düsseldorf, Staatskanzlei des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen IMG 7063 2023-07-09 20.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eindhoven, fietsenstalling 18 Septemberplein oostuitgang IMG 9940 2023-11-04 19.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eindhoven, fietsenstalling 18 Septemberplein oostuitgang IMG 9956 2023-11-04 19.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gangelt, katholische Kirche Sankt Nikolaus Dm1 IMG 7480 2023-08-26 11.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen, de toren van de Sankt-Folian Kirche Dm vanaf de Münsterplatz IMG 7988 2023-09-01 15.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen, de Aachener Dom Dm0001 - de neo-gotische klokkentoren vanaf de Rennbahn IMG 7997 2023-09-01 16.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen, de Aachener Dom Dm0001- de neo-gotische klokkentoren vanaf de Anna Strasse IMG 8003 2023-09-01 16.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen, Theater Aachen Dm IMG 8018 2023-09-01 16.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen-Kornelimünster, straatzicht Napoleonsberg met Dm (Am Berg 10-12 en 14-16 en Korneliusmarkt 4) IMG 8037 2023-09-02 10.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolberg-Breinig, katholische Kirche Sankt Barbara Dm75-3-01-42-151 IMG 8043 2023-09-02 11.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolberg, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Lucia Dm309-13-28---281 vanaf de Alten Markt IMG 8059 2023-09-02 12.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolberg, Burg Stolberg Dm1-13-07---94 vanaf de Finkenberggasse IMG 8067 2023-09-02 12.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eschweiler-Scherpenseel, kapel IMG 8110 2023-09-02 13.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen-Haaren, de Sankt Germanus Kirche Dm3249 IMG 8133 2023-09-03 09.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aldenhoven-Dürboslar, Sankt Ursula Kirche Dm17 IMG 8148 2023-09-03 12.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alsdorf-Mariadorf, Pfarrkirche Sankt Mariä Empfängnis IMG 8164 2023-09-03 13.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waimes, voormalig treinstation IMG 7494 2023-08-27 15.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waimes, het voormalige treinstation IMG 7816 2023-08-29 14.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 13:53, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waimes, l'église Saint-Saturnin IMG 7736 2023-08-29 12.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waimes, Rue de la Gare vanaf het fietspad IMG 7800 2023-08-29 14.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 16:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viersen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Joseph Dm378 IMG 7087 2023-07-10 13.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waimes-Ondenval, l'église Saint Donan IMG 7845 2023-08-29 15.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nettetal-Lobberich, de watertoren Dm148 IMG 7095 2023-07-10 14.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geilenkirchen-Gillrath, de Sankt-Marien Kirche IMG 7489 2023-08-26 11.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amel-Born, de Freiherr von Korff Brücke (voormalig spoorviaduct) IMG 7689 2023-08-28 15.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amel-Iveldingen, de Sankt Barbara Kapelle oeg31007 IMG 7720 2023-08-29 10.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen, de Aachener Dom Dm0001 - de neo-gotische klokkentoren vanaf de Münsterplatz IMG 7981 2023-09-01 15.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:18, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]

Also Fijne Kerstdagen en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar Michielverbeek (talk) 11:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Vith, de Büchel Turm oeg31040 IMG 7937 2023-08-30 18.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tussen Amel-Born en Deidenberg, panorama IMG 7535 2023-08-27 16.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waimes-Remonval, koeien in de wei IMG 7835 2023-08-29 15.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The distortion should be fixed and some sharpness added. --Ermell 09:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC) I did ✓ Done a perspective improvement and I made it a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 07:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Waimes-Ondeval, dorpspanorma met windmolen vanaf bij Croix des Sarts IMG 7862 2023-08-29 15.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amel-Möderscheid, Kapelle Sankt Brigitta IMG 7640 2023-08-28 14.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments }
Like the other two pictures from that day, this one is too dark. Should not be hard to fix though. Especially with the RAW files, though even the JPGs have enough reserves. --Plozessor 16:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I ✓ Done a bit more light --Michielverbeek 07:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now! --Plozessor 19:51, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amel, straatzicht Kircheweg vanaf het plein bij de kerk IMG 7666 2023-08-28 14.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:03, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

Traditional German advent wreath in Lonsee, my home village

Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2024!
Joyeux Noël et une bonne année 2024 !
Frohe Weihnachten und alles Gute für 2024!

AFBorchert (talk) 07:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malmedy, la Cathédrale Saints-Pierre-et-Paul et Saint-Quirin oeg63049-CLT-0006-01 IMG 7759 2023-08-29 13.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amel, Kirche Sankt Huberrtus oeg31027 IMG 7647 2023-08-28 14.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:34, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 08:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maastricht, Sint-Martinuskerk RM27823 en Stadsbrouwerij Maastricht RM506676 vanaf Uitkijkpunt Wyck Maastricht IMG 9702 2023-10-02 18.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amel-Meyerode, die Sankt Martin Kirche oeg31008 IMG 7584 2023-08-28 12.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not the best light, but QI for me. --C messier 22:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Reuland, de Sankt Stephanuskirche oeg31024 IMG 7914 2023-08-30 12.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit borderline (focus going at the top of the tower, but seems QI to me. Mike Peel 10:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Vith, Olympisch sculptuur op de rotonde van de Rodter Strasse IMG 7972 2023-08-30 18.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Mike Peel 10:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ede-Otterlo, de Hervormde kerk RM14486 IMG 0043 2024-03-03 11.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Apeldoorn-Uddel, naaldboom op heideveld IMG 0051 2024-03-03 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Apeldoorn-Uddel, naaldboom op heideveld IMG 0061 2024-03-03 13.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berkelland-Borculo, het Kristalmuseum GM1859-wikinr6 IMG 0163 2024-03-10 15.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berkelland-Geesteren, de Hervormde kerk RM9883 IMG 0173 2024-03-10 15.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zevenaar-Lathum, Nederlands Hervormde Kerk (O.L.Vrouwekerk) RM8149 IMG 0194 2024-03-25 11.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. May be better without the post at the bottom. --XRay 07:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doetinchem-Wehl, voormalige gemeentehuis GM022-WN091 IMG 0217 2024-03-25 12.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. May be better without the automobiles at the left. --XRay 07:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

{{QICpromoted|File:Montferland-'s-Heerenberg,_voormalig_klooster_Don_Rua_GM514889_IMG_0223_2024-03-25_13.54.jpg|User talk:Michielverbeek/Promotion

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Berg en Dal-Wercheren, de Thornsche Molen IMG 0280 2024-03-25 16.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bij Berg en Dal-Wercheren, de Thornse Molen IMG 0285 2024-03-25 16.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haaksbergen, de Sint-Pancratiuskerk RM18874 IMG 0106 2024-03-10 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 06:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berg en Dal-Leuth, de Remigiuskerk GM0282-wikinr85 IMG 0260 2024-03-25 16.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The picture is much too dark, especially the church. -- Spurzem 09:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for review, ✓ Done brightened church --Michielverbeek 06:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good now -- Spurzem 09:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berkelland-Rietmolen, de Sint-Caeciliakerk RM515564 IMG 0128 2024-03-10 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]