Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Goldlunula.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2009 at 23:03:46

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not very interesting. --Natural R_X 23:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- trivial, nothing special Roman Zacharij (talk) 23:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please provide a reason for your opposition per the voting instructions. --Notyourbroom (talk) 23:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Should have chosen black background --Ahnode (talk) 23:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This is not a good idea. You can not see the shadow of the Goldlunula on a black background. A black background destroys the image.--Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. —kallerna™ 13:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose possibly QI, but not enough 'wow' for FP --ianaré (talk) 19:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment What do you meen with "not enough 'wow' for FP"? The Goldlunula is 0,5 mm thin and she is made 4000 years ago only in Ireland. Nobody in the other parts of Europe could make it in the early Bronze Age. It has been hightech! It's 'wow' to see it. The Irish people are proud of it. You think: Nobody in Ireland or otherwise in Europe wants to see the Goldlunula? The FP of commons dont won't to show it?--Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i'm not saying the object itself is uninteresting, rather that it doesn't make for a stunning or exceptional photograph. --ianaré (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result 1 support, 5 oppose => not featured Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu