Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorges du Pont du Diable (63).jpg

File:Gorges du Pont du Diable (63).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2022 at 09:54:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gorges du Pont du Diable (63).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorges du Pont du Diable (63).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 09:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 09:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Is this a big river or a macro shot of something small? --Wilfredor (talk) 13:05, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment, you can see a block of wood in the background, it will let you imagine the scale. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support interesting place. --Ivar (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 19:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I like the photo, but could it be a bit sharper, or would sharpening a bit make things worse? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Sharpened version

•  Info After Ikan Kekek comment, I made this image a bit sharper. It's better? Tournasol7 (talk) 12:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support The sharpened version is much better than the original. — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Still not tack sharp, but I think this is an FP. Thanks for offering this alt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Water is noisy. And frankly the image doesn't wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 15:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
• I like it, but it does need some noise reduction. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:11, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2022 (UTC))